Skip to content
Kentucky Assn of Sexual Assault Programs Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kentucky Assn of Sexual Assault Programs Inc

Provide a structure in which the membership achieves mutual support, cooperation, and development for rape crisis programs across the state of kentucky through research, education and public advocacy.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$33MHuman Services$12MCrime & Legal$5.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$938,591
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOTUS$1,635,866
AMPERSAND SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCE$1,621,474
ION CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$1,360,307
HOPE HARBOR INC$1,355,213
GREEN RIVER REGIONAL RAPE VICTIM SV$1,345,678
SILVERLEAF SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY S$1,154,366
SANCTUARY INC$938,591
MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER$900,172
CUMBERLAND RIVER COMPREHENSIVE CARE$840,850
THE CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES$750,715
KENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE$744,650
ADANTA SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENT$726,804
PATHWAYS INC$637,679
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $415k → 7%ION CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $1.4M → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $751k → 15%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $392k → 7%ION CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $773k → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $386k → 15%ION CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $528k → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $347k → 15%ION CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $510k → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $343k → 15%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $478k → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $327k → 15%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $417k → 11%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $316k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $316k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $277k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$56M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$56M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BLUEGRASS RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC D/B/A AMPERSAND SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +29% · 54% of their budget
  • RV
    RAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +143% · 57% of their budget
  • HH
    HOPE HARBOR INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +89% · 87% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

    Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

    —
    2
    Community Beyond Violence

    CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

    —
    3
    Three Rivers Crisis Center

    Eliminating domestic violence and sexual abuse in our society.

    Human Services
    4
    Southside Survivor Response Center Inc

    Provide crisis intervention, advocacy, safety services, and education to empower people affected by sexual assault, domestic violence and various crisis situations through community collaboration.

    —
    5
    Crisis Control Center

    Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

    Human Services
    6
    Sexual Assault Counseling & Information Service

    To provide immediate & continuing counseling for victims of rape & sexual assault & referral to appropriate medical, legal, & psychological services, upon request of the victim. the organization provides sexual violence prevention…

    Health
    7
    Sexual Assault Response and Awareness Inc

    To support and assist victims of sexual violence; provide education, allied professional training and community outreach, and promote an effective, collaborative, multi-disciplinary response to sexual violence in our community.

    Health
    8
    Crisis Center of the Plains

    To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

    Human Services
    9
    Crisis Care Line

    Domestic violence victim services

    —
    10
    Lakes Crisis and Resource Center

    Fostering safety, hope and healing through advocacy, intervention and education; direct services for those affectede by domestic violence, abused children, sexual assault victims and general crimes; shelter for women and children; youth…

    Human Services
    11
    Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

    The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

    Human Services
    12
    Rape Crisis Center of Robeson County

    Crisis intervention for rape victims

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bluegrass Rape Crisis Center Inc D/B/a Ampersand Sexual Violence Resource; the most unlike its peers is Pathways Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    12/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BLUEGRASS RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC D/B/A AMPERSAND SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCE: $6,441,010 · HealthBLUEGRASS RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC D/B/A AMPERSAND SEXUAL V…GREEN RIVER REGIONAL RAPE VICTIM SERVICE DBA NEW BEGINNINGS: $4,995,830 · HealthGREEN RIVER REGIONAL RAPE VICTIM SERVICE DBA NEW BEGINNIN…MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC: $3,595,146 · HealthMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INCPATHWAYS INC: $3,502,839 · HealthPATHWAYS INCKENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE INC: $3,433,511 · HealthKENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE INCCUMBERLAND RIVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $3,181,285 · HealthCUMBERLAND RIVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INCLAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL MH-MR BOARD INC: $3,112,911 · HealthLAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL MH-MR BOARD INCRAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC: $5,656,313 · OtherRAPE VICTIM SERVICES INCHOPE HARBOR INC: $5,139,148 · OtherHOPE HARBOR INCSANCTUARY INC: $4,107,672 · OtherSANCTUARY INCIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc: $4,873,497 · Human ServicesIon Center for V…THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $3,063,383 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR W…SILVERLEAF SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $4,599,860 · Crime & LegalSILVERLEA…
    Health$28,262,532Other$14,903,133Human Services$7,936,880Crime & Legal$4,599,860

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUEGRASS RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC D/B/A AMPERSAND SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCE: $6,441,010 over 8y, 54% of budgetRAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC: $5,656,313 over 8y, 57% of budgetHOPE HARBOR INC: $5,139,148 over 8y, 87% of budgetGREEN RIVER REGIONAL RAPE VICTIM SERVICE DBA NEW BEGINNINGS: $4,995,830 over 8y, 80% of budgetIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc: $4,873,497 over 8y, 22% of budgetSILVERLEAF SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $4,599,860 over 8y, 52% of budgetSANCTUARY INC: $4,107,672 over 8y, 38% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC: $3,595,146 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $3,502,839 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetKENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE INC: $3,433,511 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCUMBERLAND RIVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $3,181,285 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetLAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL MH-MR BOARD INC: $3,112,911 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $3,063,383 over 8y, 13% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BLUEGRASS RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC D/B/A AMPERSAND SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCE ↗
    • Who funds RAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds HOPE HARBOR INC ↗
    • Who funds GREEN RIVER REGIONAL RAPE VICTIM SERVICE DBA NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
    • Who funds Ion Center for Violence Prevention Inc ↗
    • Who funds SILVERLEAF SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds SANCTUARY INC ↗
    • Who funds MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
    • Who funds KENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
    • Who funds CUMBERLAND RIVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
    • Who funds LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL MH-MR BOARD INC ↗
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Honorable Order of Ke…Zerov IncAmazonsmile Foundation
    Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Zerov Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Kentucky Assn of Sexual Assault Programs Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kentucky Assn of Sexual Assault Programs Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Kentucky Assn of Sexual Assault Programs’ filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home