Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Ucla Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
17
6
18
7
19
0
20
2
21
2
22
2
23
2
24
2
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$84kHealth$48kRecreation & Sports$23kEnvironment$15kHuman Services$14kYouth Development$3kReligion$3kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2019 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k16 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$494k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FUND$12,000
DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY DAVID GEFFEN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UCLA$10,000
UCLA FOUNDATION- WOODEN ATHLETIC FUND$5,500
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$5,000
MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION$3,200
VETS WHOLE IN ONE$2,000
DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL BRAHMA FOUNDATION$2,000
CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER$1,500
INTERNATIONAL POP TENNIS ASSOCIATION$1,000
SCGA YOUTH ON COURSE$1,000
NEWPORT HARBOR GIRLS VOLLEYBALL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHAPARRAL COMMUNITY CLUB$500
LAS MADRINAS$500
NEWPORT HARBOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION-LOS ANGELES: $300 → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%VETS WHOLE IN ONE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$162k · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$162k
$4k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    YOSEMITE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +50%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +21%
  • NH
    NEWPORT HARBOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION C/O EMILY EVANS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • PD
    PARKINSON'S DISEASE & MOVEMENT DISCORDER CENTER KECK MEDICINE OF USC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • DB
    DIAMOND BAR GIRLS SOFTBALL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • EF
    ENSIGN FUND - NHEF
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
5
Discovery Science Center of Los Angeles

We inspire and educate young minds through engaging science-based programs and exhibits to create a meaningful impact on the communities we serve.

Arts & Culture
6
California Podiatric Medical Association

It is the mission of the california podiatric medical association to promote, advance and protect the profession of podiatric medicine, to preserve the rights of the patients it serves and to seek continuous improvement in the quality of…

7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
Town and Gown of the University of Southern California

To support usc through scholarships for students, building and campus enhancement, and cultural programs.

Education
9
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
10
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
11
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation and the most unlike its peers is International Pop Tennis Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FUND — $55,500 · OtherMANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FUNDDEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY DAVID GEFFEN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UCLA — $30,000 · OtherDEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY DAVID GEFFEN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UCLAUCLA FOUNDATION- WOODEN ATHLETIC FUND — $16,500 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION- WOODEN ATHLETIC FUNDTHE CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER — $10,500 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER+16 more — $20,225 · Other+16 moreUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATI…NEWPORT HARBOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION C/O EMILY EVANS — $3,000 · EducationNEWPORT HARBO…YOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $15,035 · Recreation & SportsYOSEMITE F…INTERNATIONAL POP TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsINTERNATIO…VETS WHOLE IN ONE INC — $14,000 · Human Services+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC — $3,200 · HealthKIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$132,725Education$23,000Recreation & Sports$18,035Human Services$14,300Health$3,200Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $15,035 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVETS WHOLE IN ONE INC — $14,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER — $10,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC — $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWPORT HARBOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION C/O EMILY EVANS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL POP TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetLAS MADRINAS — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VETS WHOLE IN ONE INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER
  • Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEWPORT HARBOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION C/O EMILY EVANS
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL POP TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds LAS MADRINAS
  • Who funds KIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kenneth Glenn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph