Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ken & Nancy McKee Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$30kHealth$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kHousing & Shelter$11kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$4kFood & Nutrition$2kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEMONT STREET NURSERY$10,000
WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION$5,550
LAUREL RIDGE FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BRIGHT FUTURES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SPECIAL LOVE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,341
WATTS$1,250
WINCHESTER ELKS 867$1,212
WINCHESTER MOOSE LODGE 1283$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAUREL CENTER: $2k → 16%CHEERS TO CHARITY: $750 → 16%CHEERS TO CHARITY: $750 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 7 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$28k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+6%

Still filing today

71%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +47%
  • HF
    HIGHLAND FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +15%
  • TL
    THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CH
    CONCERN HOTLINE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • KC
    KATIE'S COMFORT HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wintergreen Volunteer Fire

The fire department provides fire protection for the wintergreen community and portions of nelson and augusta counties in virginia.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Wilton Food Pantry

To provide those in need with emergency food by working together with community members, leaders, and local businesses and organizations to gather, store, and distribute goods; to offer compassionate help as we respect the dignity of each…

Food & Nutrition
3
Winchester Area Temporary Thermal Shelter Inc

Provide temporary overnight shelter and daytime warming center for adults operated during the winter months and transitional support services offereed throughout the year.

Housing & Shelter
4
Winchendon Health Foundation Inc

Community health care.

—
5
Meals On Wheels of Charlottesville- Albemarle

To deliver hot meals to homebound persons in need.

—
6
Winsted Area Ambulance Assoc Inc

Provide emergency medical services through voluteer ambulance services

Health
7
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
8
Wilmington Community Fund Inc

Provide community aid with food and fuel assistance for households that are in need of these essentials

—
9
Wellesley Food Pantry Inc

To serve residents of wellesley who are in need of supplemental food on a regular or emergency basis. wfp serves more than 200 families across a broad demographic spectrum. wfp provides food, frozen and refridgerated meat, cheese…

Food & Nutrition
10
West End Pantry Inc

Emergency food pantry serving west end of monroe county and neighboring towns

Food & Nutrition
11
Waynesboro Community & Human Services in

Provide emergency human services

—
12
Holliston Pantry Shelfinc

Providing food and goods to the needy in holliston,ma.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Laurel Center Intervention for Domestic & Sexual Violence; the most unlike its peers is Mike Greene Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $5,000 · OtherCONCERN HOTLINE INCLAUREL RIDGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherLAUREL RIDGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIGHT FUTURES: $5,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURESKATIE'S COMFORT HOUSE: $4,083 · OtherKATIE'S COMFORT HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+20 more: $20,751 · Other+20 moreWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $10,550 · Housing & ShelterWINCHESTER R…FREMONT STREET NURSERY: $10,000 · EducationFREMONT STR…SPECIAL LOVE INC: $5,000 · HealthMIKE GREENE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $2,000 · Human ServicesCheers to Charity: $1,500 · Human ServicesHIGHLAND FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · Public BenefitWreaths Across America: $500 · Public BenefitWINCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $125 · Recreation & Sports
Other$66,834Housing & Shelter$10,550Education$10,000Health$5,500Human Services$3,500Public Benefit$2,500Recreation & Sports$125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $10,550 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFREMONT STREET NURSERY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIAL LOVE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHIGHLAND FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCheers to Charity: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMIKE GREENE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWreaths Across America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $125 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT STREET NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Cheers to Charity ↗
  • Who funds MIKE GREENE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley IncVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ken & Nancy McKee Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ken & Nancy McKee Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ken & Nancy McKee Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ken & Nancy McKee Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ken & Nancy McKee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph