Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kelly Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$53kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$11kHuman Services$6kMembership Benefit$3kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k17 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$358k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROWNWOOD FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$4,511
BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
EANES EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS$2,421
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$1,500
RANGER COLLEGE$1,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY$1,000
CASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS$1,000
BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY OF BROWNWOOD$500
MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$500
TOYS FOR KIDS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD: $1k → 11%MONTANA OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS: $2k → 5%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 6%WEST TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $1k → 9%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $3k → 10%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN BAYLOR: $2k → 14%RANGER COLLEGE: $1k → 15%BROWNWOOD FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $10k → 17%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $1k → 14%OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 9%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%ARETE ATHLETICS: $5k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%CISCO COLLEGE: $1k → 15%BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $4k → 17%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%EANES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $4k → 17%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $4k → 17%BROWNWOOD SPORTSATHLETICS: $3k → 17%BROWNWOOD SPORTSATHLETICS: $3k → 17%BROWNWOOD SPORTSATHLETICS: $3k → 17%AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY: $1k → 17%AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY: $1k → 17%BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%CASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS: $1k → 17%HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%CASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS: $1k → 17%BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%CASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS: $1k → 17%TOYS FOR KIDS: $500 → 17%SALVATION ARMY OF BROWNWOOD: $500 → 17%TOYS FOR KIDS: $500 → 17%SALVATION ARMY OF BROWNWOOD: $500 → 17%TOYS FOR KIDS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MN
MI
NM
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 15 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$57k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue -1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k

Funded once

  • CT
    CENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • MO
    MONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -27%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brownsboro Isd Education Foundation

Enrich the lives of students and staff

Philanthropy
2
Mabank Isd Education Foundation

The Mabank ISD Educational Foundation awarded teaching grants to Mabank ISD teachers and professional staff for the purpose of enhancing the educational process of Mabank ISD and its students.

Education
3
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
4
Bryan Isd Education Foundation

To aid in the fulfillment of teaching and service functions of the Bryan Independent School District by providing funds and property.

Education
5
West Texas a&M Univ Foundation

The foundation supports west texas a&m university, an institution of higher education, and the students of wtamu by receiving and administering gifts from the public.

Education
6
White Oak Education Foundation

Grants to teachers and fund supplies and curriculum to White Oak ISD. Scholarships to White Oak ISD Students.

Education
7
Bullard Education Foundation

The Bullard Education Foundation provides opportunities for excellence in education, promotes innovation in teaching, recognizes achievement, and partners with the community to enhance the quality of education for all students.

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
10
Bonham Education Foundation Inc

Promoting excellence in education in the Bonham Independent School District.

Education
11
Blanco Education Foundation

to generate funds to support innovative education for students in Blanco ISD

Education
12
Midland Isd Education Foundation

The midland education foundation exists to promote excellence in education by generating and distributing additional resources for the benefit of midland isd students and staff.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Mary Hardin-Baylor; the most unlike its peers is Toys for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $10,500 · OtherBROWN COUNTY UNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYTEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · OtherTEXAS AM UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $4,511 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $4,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · OtherANGELO STATE UNIVERSITYCASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS: $3,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY: $2,892 · Other+14 more: $12,700 · Other+14 moreBROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · EducationBROWNWOOD ART A…Eanes Education Foundation: $3,000 · EducationEanes Education…FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS: $2,421 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR …HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationHOWARD PAYNE UN…UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF M…Oklahoma Christian University: $1,000 · EducationOklahoma Christ…Belmont University: $1,000 · EducationBelmont Univers…CENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL TEXA…BROWNWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBROWNWOOD E…MONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Environment
Other$65,103Education$14,421Arts & Culture$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC: $11,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBROWNWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetEanes Education Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS: $2,421 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetToys for Kids: $1,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds BROWNWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Eanes Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR ↗
  • Who funds Toys for Kids ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · E P Woodruff Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kelly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kelly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oklahoma Christian University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kelly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph