Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kelly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MPhilanthropy$450kHealth$415kHuman Services$190kEducation$93kRecreation & Sports$92kHousing & Shelter$90kEnvironment$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $430k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANBURY HOSPITAL & NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC$140,000
Individual grant recipient$125,000
CHURCH OF ST MARY$65,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY$50,000
CASE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION - CASE FUND$50,000
OFF THE STREETS INC$40,000
SOCIETY OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS$10,000
OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS FRIARY$10,000
FAITH FOOD PANTRY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNBOUND: $15k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%OFF THE STREETS INC: $40k → 9%OFF THE STREETS INC: $25k → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $20k → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $5k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $20k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $10k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
KS
NC
SC
LA
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 18 repeat orgs$932k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$852k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+27%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $190k · revenue +7%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +55%
  • OT
    OFF THE STREETS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • WS
    We Stand With Christ Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -100%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MERCIFUL LOVE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hartford Catholic Worker Inc

The mission of Hartford Catholic Worker is to practice the works of mercy. We do this through our work with children and families in our neighborhood, helping to make sure the hungry are fed and helping secure housing for the homeless.

International
2
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
3
Foundations in Charity Inc

To provide financial support to catholic charities of fairfield county and other charitable organizations to continue to provide much needed social services to the needy and vulnerable across fairfield county.

—
4
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
The Danbury Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
Western Connecticut Home Care Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
7
Catholic Health Care System

The catholic health care system ("chcs or the "system") is a health care delivery system composed of hospitals, nursing homes, managed care plans and other entities that deliver and provide for the delivery of health care services (the…

—
8
Norwalk Hospital Foundation

The mission of norwalk hospital foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to norwalk hospital and other not-for-profit norwalk hospital affiliates.

Health
9
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
10
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
11
Christina Homecare Food Pantry Inc
Food & Nutrition
12
Franciscan Communities Inc

The mission of franciscan communities inc. ("franciscan communities") is to celebrate life and serve with joy. (continued on schedule o).

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $508,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWe Stand With Christ Inc: $500,000 · OtherWe Stand With Christ IncCHURCH OF ST MARY: $496,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST MARYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $165,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INCDANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MERCIFUL LOVE: $100,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $100,000 · OtherEQUESTRIAN ORDER OF HOLY SEPULCHRE: $92,000 · Other+21 more: $477,000 · Other+21 moreDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc: $190,000 · HealthOFF THE STREETS INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesUnbound: $22,400 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CASE FUND INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCRISTO REY DALLAS ACADEMIC CENTER: $15,000 · Education
Other$2,548,650Health$190,000Human Services$154,400Environment$45,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc: $190,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $165,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOFF THE STREETS INC: $90,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $45,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUnbound: $22,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY DALLAS ACADEMIC CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds We Stand With Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREETS INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds THE CASE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds Nuvance Health Medical Practice CT Inc ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY DALLAS ACADEMIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds FAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kelly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kelly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kelly Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kelly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kelly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph