Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Keller Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$187kHealth$85kHuman Services$46kRecreation & Sports$17kEducation$12kHousing & Shelter$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$551k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVARY CHURCH$14,500
BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP$4,250
Individual grant recipient$3,000
TURNING POINT USA$1,500
LIVING BRANCHES$1,500
SWEATSHIRT OF HOPE$1,000
EVERENCE ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
INDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
CARING BRIDGE$1,000
LINE LEXINGTON MENNONITE CHURCH$500
WOUNDED WARRIORS$500
JMGRASSE PTO$500
BRIDGE OF HOPE$500
INDIAN CREST MIDDLE SCHOOL$500
GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHRIST'S HOME: $1k → 6%CHRIST'S HOME: $500 → 6%CHRIST'S HOME: $500 → 6%CHRIST'S HOME: $500 → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $1k → 7%GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$375k · 37 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
15

Total granted

$375k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+45%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationReligionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GV
    GRAND VIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +539%
  • LB
    LIVING BRANCHES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +218%
  • BB
    BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • HC
    HAVE CHRIST WILL TRAVEL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +188%
  • LB
    LIVING BRANCHES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -42%
  • KO
    KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

2
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
3
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

4
Allied Health Care Services

Our mission is that we are committed to the people of our community, to help them overcome challenges and reach their greatest potential by providing quality care, people oriented services, and comfort. continued on schedule o.allied…

Human Services
5
Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

Health
6
The Green Home

Skilled nursing facility.

7
Allegheny Christian Ministries Inc D/B/a Laurel View Village

The organization owns and operates a long-term care facility and provides housing services to the elderly.

8
The Mennonite Home

The christ-centered mission of woodcrest villa and trillium place is to enrich the lives of residents, staff, and the community.

Human Services
9
Lebanon Valley Brethren Home

The lebanon valley brethren home, an outreach ministry of the church of the brethren, is committed to providing independent living housing, high-quality health care, and supportive services for elderly persons in an attitude of love and…

10
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
11
Upmc Senior Communities Inc

Independent and assisted senior congregate living (see schedule o)

Health
12
Calvary Fellowship Homes Inc

The christ-centered mission of calvary homes is to enrich the lives of residents, staff and the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christs Home and the most unlike its peers is Jm Grasse Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Residential CareSchool Support OrganizationsHistorical Preservation Org…Affordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Emergency …Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports LeaguesChristian Missionary and Re…Healthcare Foundations and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr12%24%35–55yr14%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%4%20–35yr12%32%35–55yr14%61%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
14%
2,451/17,942

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALVARY CHURCH — $175,600 · OtherCALVARY CHURCHGRAND VIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · OtherGRAND VIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC — $16,250 · Other+33 more — $39,400 · Other+33 moreLIVING BRANCHES — $31,000 · Housing & ShelterLIVING BRA…Habitat For Humanity of Bucks County Inc — $4,500 · Housing & ShelterHabitat Fo…KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $1,450 · Housing & ShelterPENN FOUNDATION INC — $5,700 · HealthCaringBridge — $5,000 · HealthSWEATSHIRT OF HOPE — $3,000 · HealthINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Health+2 more — $750 · HealthBRIDGE OF HOPE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTS HOME — $2,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY — $1,000 · Human ServicesHAVE CHRIST WILL TRAVEL MINISTRIES — $5,000 · ReligionJM GRASSE PTO — $2,000 · EducationSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 · EducationPHILADOPTABLES — $1,550 · Animals
Other$321,250Housing & Shelter$36,950Health$15,450Human Services$8,500Religion$5,000Education$2,500Animals$1,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRAND VIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetLIVING BRANCHES — $31,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC — $16,250 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPENN FOUNDATION INC — $5,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAVE CHRIST WILL TRAVEL MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCaringBridge — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUDERTON MENNONITE HOMES — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE INC — $5,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEVERENCE ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat For Humanity of Bucks County Inc — $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSWEATSHIRT OF HOPE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTS HOME — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING BRANCHES FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJM GRASSE PTO — $2,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPHILADOPTABLES — $1,550 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $1,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $1,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORTHWHILE WEAR INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PENN GOODWILL SERVICE INC — $900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUDERTON COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOC — $625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELFORD DIVING RESCUE UNIT — $250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAND VIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LIVING BRANCHES
  • Who funds BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC
  • Who funds PENN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HAVE CHRIST WILL TRAVEL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds CaringBridge
  • Who funds SOUDERTON MENNONITE HOMES
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds EVERENCE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Habitat For Humanity of Bucks County Inc
  • Who funds SWEATSHIRT OF HOPE
  • Who funds CHRISTS HOME
  • Who funds LIVING BRANCHES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JM GRASSE PTO
  • Who funds PHILADOPTABLES
  • Who funds SOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds INDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds WORTHWHILE WEAR INC
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTH PENN GOODWILL SERVICE INC
  • Who funds SOUDERTON COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eden Bridge FoundationPA29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eden Bridge Foundation · Ar Charitable Foundation · Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn · Foundations Community Partnership · The Philadelphia Foundation · Telford Area Community Aid Foundation · Penn Community Bank Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Amica Companies Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keller Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Bethany Birches Camp Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Keller Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Keller Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph