Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ar Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Science & Tech$54kRecreation & Sports$54kEducation$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$3kAnimals$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$4,000
KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER$1,000
HARLEYSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC$1,000
PERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
TELFORD DIVING & RESCUE UNIT$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY: $750 → 7%GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY: $500 → 7%GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$153k · 13 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$153k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+100%

Still filing today

77%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +130%
  • HA
    HARLEYSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL
    6× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +121%
  • PV
    PERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NO 1
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • RA
    RICHARD AND DOREEN D PAYNTON '52 ENGINEERING SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • PH
    PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $750 · revenue +100%
  • NP
    NORTH PENN YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hartsville Volunteer Fire Co 1

Promote fire safety and provide fire protection.

2
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

3
Indian Creek Township Volunteer Fire Deptment Inc

Provide fire protection and non-transport BLS medical.

4
Penryn Fire Company 1 Inc

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster
5
The Harford County Volunteer Fire and Ems Foundation Inc

To augment volunteer fire fighting and emergency medical services provided to harford county, maryland.

6
Portersville Muddycreek Vol Ems

Volunteer Fire and Rescue Services

Health
7
Beaver Springs Volunteer Fire Company

To provide professional fire and rescue services to the residents of spring and adams township.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Telford Volunteer Fire Company 1

To provide fire protection services to the general public.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department

The Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department provides both fire and ambulance response services in the area of Tidioute, Pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Somerset Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Tiltonsville Volunteer Fire Department

None

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Moorefield Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer fire company providing fire protection and emergency rescue services to hardy county, wv

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keystone Opportunity Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cybersonics Technology Team 103. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CYBERSONICS — $54,000 · OtherCYBERSONICSSOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $14,000 · OtherSOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCIndividual grant recipient — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $3,000 · Other+7 more — $6,950 · Other+7 moreCybersonics Technology Team 103 — $54,000 · EducationCybersonics Technology Team 103HARLEYSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL — $6,000 · HealthINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $750 · HealthPERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NO 1 — $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHARLEYSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY — $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY — $1,750 · Human Services
Other$82,450Education$54,000Health$9,250Public Safety & Disaster$6,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Human Services$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $14,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetHARLEYSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NO 1 — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTELFORD DIVING RESCUE UNIT — $2,450 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHARLEYSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY — $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY — $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cybersonics Technology Team 103
  • Who funds SOUDERTON AREA COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds HARLEYSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL
  • Who funds PERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NO 1
  • Who funds KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds INDIAN VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TELFORD DIVING RESCUE UNIT
  • Who funds HARLEYSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER OF INDIAN VALLEY
  • Who funds PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Keller Charitable Foundation IncPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Keller Charitable Foundation Inc · Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ar Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ar Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ar Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph