Skip to content

· Private foundation

Keith V Kiernan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$960k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$3.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$660kHousing & Shelter$650kEducation$576kHuman Services$371kReligion$150kPhilanthropy$105kEnvironment$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $810k
$75,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$105,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$105,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$95,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$95,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$80,000
WATERORG$75,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$75,000
GRAMEEN FOUNDATION$75,000
BERGEN FAMILY CENTER$55,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC$50,000
SANERGY$30,000
THE BAIL PROJECT$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$30,000
THE MALALA FUND$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $421k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $55k → 7%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $55k → 7%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 10%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $50k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $25k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $25k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Keith V Kiernan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Keith V Kiernan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 34% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 15 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$5.6M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+45%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $544k · revenue +70%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $415k · revenue +81%
  • BF
    BERGEN FAMILY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $371k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • A
    ALIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
5
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
6
Isf Advisors Inc

Isf advisors is the leading strategic and financial advisory group committed to mobilizing capital for a more sustainable, equitable, and productive global food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
8
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
9
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
12
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is The Malala Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $620,000 · InternationalGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USAOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $460,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNA…International Rescue Committee INC: $415,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $350,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWATERORG: $350,000 · InternationalWATERORGACCION INTERNATIONAL: $340,000 · InternationalACCION INTERNATIONALUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $220,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $140,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $610,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $425,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL I…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT: $300,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - D…INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $295,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $225,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+1 more: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $543,800 · EducationUNIVERSITY …THE MALALA FUND: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $371,000 · Human ServicesBERGEN FA…TIDES CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CEN…WINDWARD FUND: $65,000 · EnvironmentTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
International$2,895,000Other$1,885,000Education$575,800Human Services$471,000Environment$65,000Crime & Legal$30,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $620,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $543,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $460,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $415,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $371,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $350,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATERORG: $350,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL: $340,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $220,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANERGY INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWINDWARD FUND: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALIGHT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗
  • Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MALALA FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keith V Kiernan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keith V Kiernan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Keith V Kiernan’s filings →

More from the funding graph