Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kcrcw Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$862k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$401kHuman Services$375kPhilanthropy$328kEducation$210kHousing & Shelter$150kYouth Development$133kEmployment$50kRecreation & Sports$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $664k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Legacy Health$200,000
Connective$164,000
Center for Urban Transformation$150,000
FW Community Redevelopment CRC$75,000
Small Steps$75,000
ProUnitas$45,000
Urban Enrichment Institute$35,000
Hester House$25,000
Houston reVision$25,000
SPARK$25,000
Bridge Year$20,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
Progressive FW Community Association$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Center for Urban Transformation: $200k → 16%Center for Urban Transformation: $150k → 16%Bridge Year: $20k → 16%Bridge Year: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR URBAN TRANSFORMATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $350k · revenue +44% · 56% of their budget
  • SS
    Small Steps Nurturing Center
    2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · revenue +4%
  • PI
    PROUNITAS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • WS
    West Street Recovery
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
  • OA
    OUR AFRIKAN FAMILY
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • UH
    URBAN HEALING HTX
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
2
Opportunity Resource Services Inc

Disrupt generational proverty in TX by empowering vulnerable teens & adults-especially 1st generation college students,low-income persons,& those involved with the crimminal justice system-to attain higher ed. degrees of value,secure…

Youth Development
3
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
4
Made Houston

MADE Houston was formed to create a school community focused on nurturing and developing the unique academic and social needs of students with learning differences and to successfully transition students into mainstream schools.

Education
5
Urban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc

Urban Neighborhood Initiatives, Inc. (UNI) engages in comprehensive action to address human and community development. Individuals and families are enthused as they prosper and become encouraged to invest in their homes and communities.

Human Services
6
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
7
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
8
Illumination Education Inc

Academy of Visual and Performing Arts (AVPA) provides a safe and challenging learning environment that cultivates students' academic and artistic excellence.

Education
9
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
10
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
11
The Greatest School in West Houston

Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from

—
12
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Revision; the most unlike its peers is Our Afrikan Family. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Legacy Health: $400,000 · OtherLegacy HealthFW Community Redevelopment CRC: $150,000 · OtherFW Community Redevelopment CRCHester House: $50,000 · OtherHester HouseIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $16,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR URBAN TRANSFORMATION INC: $350,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR URBAN TRAN…BRIDGEYEAR: $35,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEYEARCONNECTIVE: $328,000 · PhilanthropyCONNECTIVESmall Steps Nurturing Center: $150,000 · EducationSmall Steps N…THE URBAN ENRICHMENT INSTITUTE: $47,500 · EducationTHE URBAN ENR…PROUNITAS INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPARK: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsHOUSTON REVISION: $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$641,500Human Services$385,000Philanthropy$328,000Education$197,500Youth Development$60,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Crime & Legal$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR URBAN TRANSFORMATION INC: $350,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetCONNECTIVE: $328,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $150,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPROUNITAS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSPARK: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE URBAN ENRICHMENT INSTITUTE: $47,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBRIDGEYEAR: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWest Street Recovery: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR URBAN TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center ↗
  • Who funds PROUNITAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARK ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON REVISION ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN ENRICHMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEYEAR ↗
  • Who funds West Street Recovery ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Houston Endowment IncTX21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Houston Endowment Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Rockwell Fund Inc · The Powell Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The William Stamps Farish Fund · United Way of Greater Houston · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kcrcw Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kcrcw Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kcrcw Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kcrcw Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kcrcw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph