· Private foundation
KBS Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| DONALD D SHERRILL EDUCATION CNTR - ELEM | $10,000 |
| PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FEEDING SAN DIEGO | $10,000 |
| INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO | $10,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SCHOOLCRAFT MICHIGAN | $5,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
| MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS | $5,000 |
| MEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC | $5,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SCHOOLCRAFT MICHIGAN | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MPMILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $36k · revenue -6%
- ISINTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +1%
- PFPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue -24%
Funded once
- BDB Dacyone grant, 2024 · $7k
- MRM Ryskampone grant, 2024 · $7k
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.
Fhcsd's primary mission is to provide comprehensive, accessible and quality health care services to all income levels with a special committment to low income medically underserved individuals.
Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.
Planned Parenthood Northern California generates healthier communities through the delivery of quality sexual and reproductive health care services.
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.
Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc. ("PPPSGV") are essential health care providers and trusted educators who center our work on sexual and reproductive care and advocate for all people to live authentic and healthy…
Planned parenthood orange and san bernardino counties provides an exceptional health care experience for every patient, protects and promotes the fundamental right of all individuals to make their own personal health decisions, and…
Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The mission of Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc. (PPGC) is to ensure the right and ability of all individuals to manage their sexual and reproductive health by providing health services, education and advocacy.
To ensure broad public access to sexual and reproductive health care through direct service, education and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Project for the Homeless. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILLARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds The Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood San Antonio ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization KBS Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to KBS Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to KBS Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.