Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kazarian Donations Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$174kHealth$89kArts & Culture$77kCivil Rights$47kEducation$47kHuman Services$33kPublic Benefit$32kCommunity Improvement$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF PORTUGAL INC$18,000
SAINTS SAHAG & MESROB ARMENIAN CHURCH$7,000
PAWTUCKET HALL OF FAME$3,000
STS VARTANANTZ ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH$2,000
CHABAD CHAI CENTER OF WEST BAY$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITAL$1,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
ARMENIAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF RI$1,000
MIRIAM HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,000
ORRAN$1,000
ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA$1,000
OGAN FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORRAN: $10k → 14%ORRAN: $2k → 14%ORRAN: $2k → 14%ORRAN: $1k → 14%ORRAN: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$533k · 29 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$533k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+133%

Still filing today

62%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +162%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +48%
  • AF
    American Friends of Chabad of Portugal
    2× · 2024–2025 · $29k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHARLES & AGNES KAZARIAN FOUNDATION C/O PAUL B KAZARIANgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +133%
  • FB
    FALL BALL FOR DANA FARBER
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • AH
    ASSOCIACAO HUMANITARIA OS CACULINHAS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Arpi Publishing

The organization's mission is to preserve the western armenian language; createoriginal picture books, contemporary graphic novels, young adult books, andclassroom resources in western armenian; create audio books of all books…

Arts & Culture
3
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
4
The Amer Research Inst of the South Cauc

The American Research Institute of the South Caucasus (ARISC) encourages and supports scholarly study of the South Caucasus states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia) across all disciplines of the Humanities, Sciences, and Social Sciences.…

International
5
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
6
Armenian National Committee of America Western Region

The anca-wr works in coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters throughout the western united states to actively advance the concerns of the armenian american community on a range of issues. these issues include…

Civil Rights
7
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
8
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
11
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
21/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINTS SAHAG AND MESROB ARMENIAN CHURCH: $83,725 · OtherSAINTS SAHAG AND MESROB ARMENIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $79,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD CHAI CENTER OF WEST BAY: $23,000 · OtherCHABAD CHAI CENTER OF WEST BAYCITY OF PAWTUCKET DEPT OF PLANNING & REDEVELOPMENT: $13,500 · OtherFALL BALL FOR DANA FARBER: $12,500 · OtherTHE CHARLES & AGNES KAZARIAN FOUNDATION C/O PAUL B KAZARIAN: $15,146 · OtherORRAN: $16,000 · Other+24 more: $106,457 · Other+24 moreCREATIVE ARMENIA: $30,000 · InternationalCREATIVE ARMEN…ANCA ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $27,000 · InternationalANCA ENDOWMENT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $12,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEN…ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 · InternationalARMENIAN ASSEM…FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF FON…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $40,000 · HealthDana-Farbe…The Miriam Hospital Foundation: $12,000 · HealthThe Miriam…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,000 · HealthMEMORIAL S…FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $18,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureARMENIAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF RI: $10,000 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $33,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,000 · Civil RightsPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $26,667 · EducationPROVIDENCE PROMISE: $10,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Chabad of Portugal: $28,500 · Religion
Other$349,828International$81,500Health$58,000Arts & Culture$39,000Civil Rights$37,000Education$36,667Religion$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE ARMENIA: $30,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad of Portugal: $28,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetANCA ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $27,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $26,667 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORRAN: $16,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHARLES & AGNES KAZARIAN FOUNDATION C/O PAUL B KAZARIAN: $15,146 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $12,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Miriam Hospital Foundation: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF RI: $10,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational Association for Armenian Studies and Research Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAB SCHOOL OF WASHINGTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHTING CHANCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE ARMENIA ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Chabad of Portugal ↗
  • Who funds ANCA ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ORRAN ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES & AGNES KAZARIAN FOUNDATION C/O PAUL B KAZARIAN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC ↗
  • Who funds The Miriam Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF RI ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds National Association for Armenian Studies and Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAB SCHOOL OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kasper and Siroon Hovannisian Family Cultural FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kasper and Siroon Hovannisian Family Cultural Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kazarian Donations Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kazarian Donations Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kazarian Donations Trust?

Find your warmest path to Kazarian Donations Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kazarian Donations’ filings →

More from the funding graph