Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kavanaugh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$14kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$11kReligion$8kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$3kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA JOLLA PLAHOUSE$5,000
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$4,342
TEXAS A&M$2,500
THE BISHOPS SCHOOL$2,500
IRISH OUTREACH CENTER$2,500
NURTURED BY NATURE$2,000
SOMFABRADYS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,500
OUR MOTHER OF CONFIDENCE$1,500
SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART$1,500
MIDWAY MUSEUM$1,000
COMMUNITY FUND OF TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$1,000
WAY HOME FOR DOGS$1,000
C2K$1,000
MIT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HONOR FLIGHT: $1k → 7%FREEDOM DOGS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
NC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 12 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$44k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
0%

Still filing today

25%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    IRISH OUTREACH CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k
  • BS
    BISHOP SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k

Funded once

  • HC
    HAWAII COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Semper K9 Assistance Dogs

Combat veteran-founded and operated Semper K9s mission is to enhance the quality of life for wounded members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families by providing them with custom-trained mental health mobility service dogs. Using…

Public Benefit
2
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
3
Northwest Battle Buddies

To empower combat veterans with ptsd to regain their freedom and independence by partnering them with professionally trained and specifically matched service dogs at no charge to serve those who have served us all.

Human Services
4
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
5
The National World War Ii Museum Inc

The national wwii museum tells the story of the american experience in the war that changed the world-why it was fought, how it was won, and what it means today-so that all generations will understand the price of freedom and be inspired…

Arts & Culture
6
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
7
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
8
Fallen Soldiers March

Providing highly trained service dogs for wounded united states military veterans in need of assistance

—
9
Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services
10
Honor Flight San Diego

Transport american vets to washington dc

Public Benefit
11
Pets for Vets Minneapolis-St Paul

To help heal the emotional wounds of military veterans by using the power of the human-animal bond to provide a second chance for shelter animals by rescuing, training and pairing them with america's servicemen and women who could benefit…

Animals
12
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter to Soldier Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IRISH OUTREACH CENTER: $7,500 · OtherIRISH OUTREACH CENTERBISHOP SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherBISHOP SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLA JOLLA PLAHOUSE: $5,000 · OtherLA JOLLA PLAHOUSEOUR MOTHER OF CONFIDENCE: $2,960 · OtherTEXAS A&M: $2,500 · OtherREGIS HIGH SCHOOL: $2,100 · OtherSLU: $2,060 · OtherMIT: $2,050 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FUND: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,933 · Other+14 more: $14,850 · Other+14 moreFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $5,384 · Food & NutritionSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $3,700 · Arts & CultureMaritime Museum Association of San Diego: $500 · Arts & CultureNurtured by Nature: $2,000 · AnimalsA WAY HOME FOR DOGS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $1,000 · AnimalsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,500 · HealthHONOR FLIGHT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM DOGS: $500 · Human ServicesWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC: $500 · Employment
Other$57,953Food & Nutrition$5,384Arts & Culture$4,200Animals$4,000Religion$2,000Health$1,500Human Services$1,500Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $5,384 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,933 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA WAY HOME FOR DOGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM DOGS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Nurtured by Nature ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds A WAY HOME FOR DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER TO SOLDIER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM DOGS ↗
  • Who funds Maritime Museum Association of San Diego ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kavanaugh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kavanaugh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kavanaugh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph