Skip to content

· Public charity

Katie & Thomas Haynes Memorial Educational Fund

Fund is dedicated to supporting young people and their families.

$723k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$491k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$853kYouth Development$173kHuman Services$172kFood & Nutrition$100kEducation$58kReligion$8k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $706,195, the rows itemized in this filing. The $723,450 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,255 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $491k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$490,995
ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION$50,000
STS SIMON & JUDE CHURCH$37,000
ST FRANCIS CENTER$25,000
LOAVES & FISHES$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS HUNT VALLE$25,000
CBC CARING FOR CHILDREN$23,200
ROBYNES NEST$20,000
VISION OF HOPE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $10k → 10%CBC CARING FOR CHILDREN: $23k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 8 repeat orgs$531k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$573k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $514k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    St Francis Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +5%
  • RN
    ROBYNES NEST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +29%
  • IH
    ISAIAH HOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • Share Our Selves Corporation
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • MO
    MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INC: $490,995 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INCSt Francis Center: $220,000 · OtherSt Francis CenterLOAVES & FISHES: $100,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHESSts Simon and Jude Church: $70,000 · OtherSts Simon and Jude Church+3 more: $64,888 · Other+3 moreONEOC: $260,000 · PhilanthropyONEOCISAIAH HOUSE INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyISAIAH HOUSE INCROBYNES NEST: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentCbc Caring for Children Inc: $23,200 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves Corporation: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $30,000 · Education
Other$945,883Philanthropy$300,000Youth Development$55,000Human Services$33,200Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONEOC: $260,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSt Francis Center: $220,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROBYNES NEST: $55,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCbc Caring for Children Inc: $23,200 over 1y, 10% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONEOC ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Center ↗
  • Who funds ROBYNES NEST ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds Cbc Caring for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katie & Thomas Haynes Memorial Educational Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katie & Thomas Haynes Memorial Educational Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katie & Thomas Haynes Memorial Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph