Skip to content
Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital

To restore, maintain, and enhance health by providing superior care now and in the future.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$358kHuman Services$166kEducation$113kArts & Culture$30kCommunity Improvement$24kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $35,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,130 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,130 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIXON FAMILY YMCA$20,000
HOME OF HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $6k → 12%UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $5k → 12%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING (LCCOA): $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 9 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$431k
$282k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-5%

Still filing today

56%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    DIXON FAMILY YMCA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $161k · revenue +21%
  • HC
    HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +8%
  • DC
    DIXON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND MAIN STREET INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $24k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • KH
    KSB HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -98% · 54% of their budget
  • KH
    KSB HOSPITAL CARING FRIENDS
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue -60%
  • TN
    THE NEXT PICTURE SHOW INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital

To restore, maintain, and enhance health by providing superior care now and in the future.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council

To Promote High Quality Accessible Healthcare for all communities.

—
7
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
8
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Unity Healthcare

The mission of trinity-muscatine is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
11
Iowa Hospital Association

The iowa hospital association reimagines health care in iowa for life changing outcomes. as the voice and principal advocate for iowa's hospitals, iha provides strategic leadership, resources, and support to ensure its members can…

—
12
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Hospital Research & Educational Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hope Cancer Wellness Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KSB HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthKSB HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $122,000 · HealthHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS+2 more: $12,707 · HealthDIXON FAMILY YMCA: $161,360 · OtherDIXON FAMILY YMCADIXON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST 170: $25,950 · OtherDIXON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST 170FAITH ASSEMBLY OF GRAND DETOUR: $24,550 · OtherFAITH ASSEMBLY OF GRAND DETOURSAUK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $24,131 · OtherSAUK VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGEDIXON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND MAIN STREET INC: $24,073 · OtherDIXON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND MAIN STREET INCAMBOY CUSD #272: $18,206 · OtherAMBOY CUSD #272KSB HOSPITAL CARING FRIENDS: $17,839 · OtherKSB HOSPITAL CARING FRIENDS+3 more: $23,716 · Other+3 moreTHE NEXT PICTURE SHOW INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTORIC DIXON THEATRE GROUP: $7,500 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $20,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $10,750 · Human ServicesLEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5,016 · Human Services
Health$334,707Other$319,825Arts & Culture$22,500Education$20,000Human Services$15,766

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKSB HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetDIXON FAMILY YMCA: $161,360 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $122,000 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetDIXON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND MAIN STREET INC: $24,073 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKSB HOSPITAL CARING FRIENDS: $17,839 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE NEXT PICTURE SHOW INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $10,750 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMCHC CHICAGO HOSPITAL COUNCIL: $7,610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIXON MAIN STREET INC: $7,500 over 1y, 32% of budgetTHE HISTORIC DIXON THEATRE GROUP: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $5,791 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS HOSPITAL RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,097 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5,016 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dixon Community TrustDonor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Dixon Community TrustIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dixon Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home