Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dixon Community Trust

TO ASSIST CHARITABLE AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS IN THE DIXON, ILLINOIS AND LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS AREA.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$42kArts & Culture$35kCrime & Legal$25kPhilanthropy$20kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$8kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY$6,000
DIXON FAMILY YMCA$5,500
DIXON PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,110
DIXON PETUNIA FESTIVAL$4,000
DIXON IL POLICE DEPARTMENT$3,000
GOOD FELLOWS$2,500
DIXON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BUDDY BAGS OF DIXON$1,000
HOME OF HOPE$1,000
LEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY: $6k → 12%UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$87k · 13 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$87k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-3%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DIXON IL POLICE DEPARTMENT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $21k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • DP
    DIXON PETUNIA FESTIVAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • RR
    RONALD REAGAN HOME PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k · revenue +5%
  • DP
    DIXON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST 170
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • SV
    SAUK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Dixon House Inc
2
The Dixon Water Foundation
3
Dixon Senior Center

Senior citizen assistance

4
Dixon-Hightower Inc
Youth Development
5
The John Dickson Home
6
Danis Sox in the Box
Philanthropy
7
The Dixon Gallery & Gardens Endowment Fund

To accept contributions, honorariums, memorials and bequests with a specific reference for the sole benefit of dixon gallery and gardens.

Arts & Culture
8
Dixon Chamber of Commerce and Main Street Inc

For the betterment and growth of dixon, the dixon chamber of commerce and main street advocates for our businesses, community, and visitors by promoting economic development, cultural programs, civic engagement and historic preservation.

9
Denton Affordable Housing Corporation

To increase the supply of affordable housing in the denton area through acquisition, renovation, construction, promotion, financing, development, management and operation of both rental housing and homes offered to first-time homebuyers.…

Housing & Shelter
10
Dixon Old People's Fund Inc

It shall be the mission of heritage square, a non-profit corporation, to provide quality care in a warm and loving environment for our residents. we shall make every effort to respect the dignity of each resident as a productive and…

11
Dixon Area Caring Center Inc

Community center to help those in need and community support

Human Services
12
Dalton-Whitfield Community Development Corporation

To facilitate the ability of all dalton and whitfield co. residents to acquire and maintain safe and decent housing.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dixon Family Ymca and the most unlike its peers is Sauk Valley College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIXON IL POLICE DEPARTMENT — $21,000 · OtherDIXON IL POLICE DEPARTMENTDIXON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST 170 — $20,000 · OtherDIXON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST 170SAUK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherSAUK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONDIXON PETUNIA FESTIVAL — $9,500 · OtherDIXON PETUNIA FESTIVALGOOD FELLOWS — $8,500 · OtherGOOD FELLOWSDIXON FAMILY YMCA — $7,500 · OtherDIXON FAMILY YMCADIXON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $6,642 · OtherDIXON PUBLIC LIBRARYDIXON FOOD PANTRY — $6,000 · OtherDIXON FOOD PANTRYDIXON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $5,000 · Other+8 more — $12,500 · Other+8 moreRONALD REAGAN HOME PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureRONALD REAGAN HOME…UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS — $2,000 · HealthDIXON PADS SHELTER — $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$111,642Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$11,000Health$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRONALD REAGAN HOME PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSAUK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDIXON PETUNIA FESTIVAL — $9,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDIXON FAMILY YMCA — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIXON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $5,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDIXON PADS SHELTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RONALD REAGAN HOME PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAUK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds DIXON PETUNIA FESTIVAL
  • Who funds DIXON FAMILY YMCA
  • Who funds DIXON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS
  • Who funds DIXON PADS SHELTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Katherine Shaw Bethea HospitalIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dixon Community Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dixon Community Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Dixon Community Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph