Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katherine and John Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$297k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Youth Development$115kRecreation & Sports$110kEducation$87kHealth$60kArts & Culture$50kEnvironment$20kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDERNESS PEDALERS INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI FOUNDATION$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN$25,000
WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
CARLETON COLLEGE - PARENTS FUND$10,000
THE REDFORD CENTER$10,000
FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN$10,000
YOUTH GO$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI FOUNDATION$7,000
TELLURIDE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
911 THE AVENUE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY: $75k → 7%YOUTH GO: $10k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY: $25k → 7%YOUTH GO: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 9 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$322k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • YG
    YOUTH GO INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CM
    CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • FV
    Fox Valley Memory Project Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • IS
    IUF SCHWARZ FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
2
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
3
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
4
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
5
Wisconsin Progress Institute Inc

Wisconsin progress institute exists to empower wisconsin's locally elected leaders with the tools, training, and support they need to be effective, values-driven public servants.

Education
6
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
7
Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation Inc

The Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation WPBF supports the work of the Educational Communications Board ECB a State of Wisconsin agency committed to ensuring that public media and public safety programs and services are available…

Arts & Culture
8
Wisconsin Broadcasters Association Foundation Inc

The wisconsin broadcasters association foundation contribution to broadcasting in wisconsin encompasses a strategic, long term vision for enhancing, promoting and supporting the broadcast industry by encouraging the preservation of…

Arts & Culture
9
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
10
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
11
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
12
Willamette Riverkeeper

Willamette riverkeeper's guiding principle is: "we believe a river with excellent water quality, abundant natural habitat, safe for fishing and recreation is a basic public right." for 27 years, willamette riverkeeper (wrk) has acted as…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Pbs Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wilderness Pedalers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY…YOUTH GO INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH GO INCWILDERNESS PEDALERS INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementWILDERNESS PEDALERS INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $67,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…Fox Valley Memory Project Inc: $10,000 · HealthFox Valley Memo…FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF P…WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN PU…MUSIC THAT MATTERS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC THAT M…CARLETON COLLEGE - PARENTS FUND: $20,000 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $10,000 · OtherIUF SCHWARZ FUND: $5,000 · OtherREDFORD CENTER INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$115,000Community Improvement$100,000Education$67,000Health$60,000Arts & Culture$50,000Other$35,000Environment$20,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILDERNESS PEDALERS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $67,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH GO INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFox Valley Memory Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSIC THAT MATTERS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J J Keller Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J J Keller Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katherine and John Davis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katherine and John Davis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Katherine and John Davis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Katherine and John Davis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katherine and John Davis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph