Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kate Bill & Diane Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$51kReligion$39kHuman Services$34kEnvironment$22kEducation$20kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$13kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$596k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Emmanuel Episcopal Church$9,750
WESTERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK$9,650
ALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
EVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND$5,000
Family Crisis Resource Center Inc$2,000
CUMBERLAND VALLEY OPTMIST CLUB$2,000
COUNTY UNITED WAY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $5k → 18%UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND: $5k → 18%UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND: $5k → 18%YMCA: $3k → 18%Family Crisis Resource Center Inc: $2k → 18%FAMILY CRISIS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2k → 18%Family Crisis Resource Center Inc: $2k → 18%Family Crisis Resource Center Inc: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 11 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$190k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+16%

Still filing today

64%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    Western Maryland Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +53%
  • EH
    EVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO
    5× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +77%
  • YO
    YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AC
    Allegany County Library System
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -23%
  • SP
    SOUTH PENN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TL
    THE LEAGUE FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN I
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Library of Allegheny Valley

The Library is a center for informational resources and services, promoting literacy and lifelong learning. The Library has achieved the status of Family Place Library, a national initiative to encourage the beginning stages of literacy in…

—
2
Community Development Network of Maryland Inc

To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.

Community Improvement
3
Conflict Resolution Center of Baltimore County Inc

To support the resolution of interpersonal and community conflict through the use of mediation, community conferencing and other restorative services and education. crc services are accessible to all persons and organizations in baltimore…

Crime & Legal
4
Conflict Resolution Center of Montgomery County Inc

The Organization's mission is to promote and provide collaborative problem solving processes throughout Montgomery County, MD.

Crime & Legal
5
Montgomery County Community Action Development Commission

To provide direct services to the economically disadvantaged and to combat poverty for local residents through various programs such as employment training, rental and utility bills assistance and other community based programs.

Human Services
6
Cumberland County Communicare Inc

Developing new quality community-based programs using evidence-based (research driven) practices; improving the quality of existing or evolving programs by improving program evaluation and accountability; incorporating funded and related…

Crime & Legal
7
Wetzel County Center for Children and Families Inc

Provide programs and services that support & strengthen Wetzel County famiilies thru interagency coordination, collaboration and communication. communication.

Human Services
8
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
9
Washington County Free Library

The mission of the washington county free library system is to continually improve our service to the public by:* providing the public with free access to library materials in a variety of formats* promoting community enrichment, economic…

Education
10
Westmoreland County Federated Library System

Improve library and informational services for the residents of Westmoreland County.

Public Benefit
11
Lycoming County Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Full-service animal shelter, animal care, adoptive services, humane investigaation services and humane education.

Animals
12
Narberth Community Food Bank

Providing food to the community from the food bank.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is County United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Maryland Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $39,400 · OtherEMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CHURCHCUMBERLAND VALLEY OPTIMIST CLUB INC: $10,500 · OtherCUMBERLAND VALLEY OPTIMIST CLUB INCALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSUNION RESCUE MISSION OF: $8,600 · OtherUNION RESCUE MISSION OF+10 more: $22,000 · Other+10 moreWestern Maryland Food Bank: $50,800 · Food & NutritionWestern Maryland Food BankUNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE …YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF CUMBE…FAMILY CRISIS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS…EVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO: $22,000 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN H…COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF JANES PLACE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentAllegany County Library System: $5,000 · EducationTHE LEAGUE FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN I: $2,500 · Health
Other$90,500Food & Nutrition$50,800Human Services$26,000Environment$22,000Philanthropy$12,500Youth Development$10,000Education$5,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWestern Maryland Food Bank: $50,800 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetEVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO: $22,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF JANES PLACE: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAllegany County Library System: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEAGUE FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN I: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Western Maryland Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JANES PLACE ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Allegany County Library System ↗
  • Who funds THE LEAGUE FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN I ↗
  • Who funds THE TALBOT OPTIMIST CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Woodmark Foundation IncVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Community Trust Foundation Inc · The Doug and Betsey Schwab and Family Foundation Inc · Delfest Foundation Inc · Firstenergy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kate Bill & Diane Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kate Bill & Diane Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Family Crisis Resource Center Inc: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kate Bill & Diane’s filings →

More from the funding graph