Skip to content

Kansas · Private foundation

Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
80%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$37,500
Organizations funded a year
5 to 10
FY2023 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$252k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 80% of the organizations Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$120k14%
FY202410$81k80%
FY20235$65kn/a
73% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$96kHuman Services$76kHealth$50kScience & Tech$25kAnimals$10kArts & Culture$300Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Wichita Children's Home$75,00030%
Wichita Collegiate School$65,00030%
Hunter Health Clinic$50,00020%
Exploration Place Inc$25,00010%
Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas$10,00020%
Wichita Art Museum Inc$30010%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($40k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

DeVore Foundation IncKS15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: DeVore Foundation Inc · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation with peer funders

About Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation

How much does Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation give?
Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $119,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 10 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.
What does Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (36%), Human Services (29%), Health (19%).
Who are Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: The Wichita Children's Home ($75k), Wichita Collegiate School ($65k), Hunter Health Clinic ($50k).
Does Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include DeVore Foundation Inc, Lattner Family Foundation Inc, Ima Foundation.
Where is Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation based?
Kate and Dan Taylor Foundation is based in KS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kate and Dan Taylor’s filings →

More from the funding graph