Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kashper Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$608kArts & Culture$404kYouth Development$83kHealth$30kReligion$28kHuman Services$15kInternational$10kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Seven Arrows Elementary School$50,000
Chabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific Palisades$18,000
Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi$15,000
LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY$11,000
POLYTECNIC SCHOOL$11,000
Young Advocates for Fair Education$10,000
HERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIONAL TAY-SACKS: $10k → 16%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $5k → 14%CHABAD OF REGO PARK: $10k → 13%MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE: $100k → 17%Young Advocates for Fair Education: $10k → 20%HARMONY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%REMEMBER US: $24k → 14%CHABAD OF REGO PARK: $5k → 13%NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC: $15k → 17%HARMONY FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%HARVARD WESTLAKE: $60k → 14%HERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION: $13k → 17%HARVARD WESTLAKE: $60k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GIFT SYSTEMS: $100k → 17%HARVARD WESTLAKE: $60k → 14%HERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HARVARD WESTLAKE: $30k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GIFT SYSTEMS: $30k → 17%THE HARMONY PROJECT: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $10k → 14%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $15k → 17%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $15k → 17%SALON DE VIRTOUSI Inc: $15k → 17%SALON DE VIRTOUSI Inc: $15k → 17%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $10k → 17%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $10k → 17%MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $30k → 14%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $10k → 17%MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $30k → 14%Charlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi: $10k → 17%MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $30k → 14%MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $27k → 14%JCP OF LOWER MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $20k → 14%FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT ARTISTS: $15k → 17%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $30k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $20k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $15k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $15k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $11k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $10k → 14%Seven Arrows Elementary School: $50k → 14%Chabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific Palisades: $30k → 14%Chabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific Palisades: $30k → 14%Chabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific Palisades: $18k → 14%POLYTECNIC SCHOOL: $11k → 14%CARTHORP SCHOOL: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Kashper Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 37% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 31% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kashper Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$900k · 14 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$900k
$224k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+18%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
    5× · 2017–2021 · $137k · revenue +64%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +43%
  • CS
    CARLTHORP SCHOOL
    4× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -6%
  • RU
    REMEMBER US
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • NY
    NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Jewish Historical Society

See schedule o - the american jewish historical society (the "society") is the oldest ethnic, cultural archive in the united states. the society provides access to more than 30 million documents and 50,000 books, photographs, art and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
5
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
6
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
7
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

9
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
10
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seven Arrows Elementary School and the most unlike its peers is Envolved Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GIFT SYSTEMS — $130,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GIFT SYSTEMSChabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific Palisades — $78,000 · OtherChabad Jewish Comm Ctr Pacific PalisadesCharlotte's White Salon De Virtuosi — $70,000 · OtherCharlotte's White Salon De VirtuosiSALON DE VIRTOUSI Inc — $32,500 · OtherREMEMBER US — $24,000 · Other+15 more — $118,058 · Other+15 moreLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY — $111,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONYMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A…HERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION — $28,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATIO…NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN — $137,000 · EducationTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR …SEVEN ARROWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationSEVEN ARROWS ELEMENTAR…CARLTHORP SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationCARLTHORP SCHOOLHarmony Project — $15,000 · EducationHarmony ProjectTHE URBAN DOVE INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$662,558Arts & Culture$284,000Education$232,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN — $137,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY — $111,000 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEVEN ARROWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARLTHORP SCHOOL — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetNEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARMONY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHarmony Project — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN DOVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPABST MANSION INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVOLVED FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST
  • Who funds SEVEN ARROWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
  • Who funds CARLTHORP SCHOOL
  • Who funds HERITAGE PROJECTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC
  • Who funds HARMONY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Harmony Project
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah
  • Who funds THE URBAN DOVE INC
  • Who funds PABST MANSION INC
  • Who funds ENVOLVED FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BURBANK TEMPLE EMANU EL
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kashper Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kashper Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kashper Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph