Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karen Alice Nilsen Olsen Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kYouth Development$36kEducation$36kArts & Culture$35kHousing & Shelter$35kAnimals$24kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD CANCER UNITED WEST$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL$6,000
ANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,000
MAPLE VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY$5,000
VINE MAPLE PLACE$5,000
BLACK DIAMOND COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
PAVE-PAWS ASSISTING VETERANS$4,000
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF JUNCTION CITY$4,000
ROCAWAY BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION$3,000
ARRL FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC$1,200
THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,000
WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION$1,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
OR
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 24 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
8

Total granted

$300k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+66%

Still filing today

63%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureEmploymentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VINE MAPLE PLACE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +75%
  • GC
    GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +42%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • SC
    St Charles Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +66%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -224%
  • LH
    LEGACY HEALTH - MARK A TERRY ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
6
Bloodworks

Saving lives through research, innovation, education and excellence in blood, medical and laboratory services in partnership with our community.

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
9
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
12
Lymphoma Research Foundation

To eradicate lymphoma and serve those touched by this disease.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Center; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - OREGON: $23,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - OREGONANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONROCAWAY BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $16,000 · OtherROCAWAY BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONPAVE-PAWS ASSISTING VETERANS: $12,000 · OtherPAVE-PAWS ASSISTING VETERANSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $12,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLOOD CANCER UNITED WEST: $10,000 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITED WESTWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATIONLONG BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherARRL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Other+13 more: $51,600 · Other+13 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNI…St Charles Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthSt Charles Found…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCE…GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN F…ALS Northwest: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthVINE MAPLE PLACE: $30,000 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE …Operation Warm Inc: $5,400 · Human ServicesOperation W…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMAPLE VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHEST: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMAPLE VAL…GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHWEST CENTER: $20,000 · EmploymentOregon State University Foundation: $16,000 · Education
Other$179,600Health$53,000Human Services$36,400Arts & Culture$30,000Youth Development$24,000Employment$20,000Education$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAPLE VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHEST: $30,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Charles Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetARRL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $5,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALS Northwest: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAPLE VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHEST ↗
  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds St Charles Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARRL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALS Northwest ↗
  • Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karen Alice Nilsen Olsen Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karen Alice Nilsen Olsen Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karen Alice Nilsen Olsen’s filings →

More from the funding graph