Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Kara Love Project

The KARA LOVE PROJECT aims to improve the psychological health of individuals by providing quality community programming, focusing on education and psychologically transformational workshops, restorative retreats, and therapeutic sessions which involve yoga or other healing modalities and which nurture a sense of community and human…

$155k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
23
Grants FY2024
19
Organizations funded FY2023
84%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$25,400
Organizations funded a year
1 to 19
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$2.6M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 84% of the organizations Kara Love Project funded were first-time grantees, receiving 65% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving20$125k45%
FY202319$141k84%
FY20221$10k0%
FY20214$39k75%
FY20204$30kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$73kReligion$68kEducation$53kFood & Nutrition$50kPhilanthropy$48kAnimals$33kCivil Rights$20kEnvironment$12kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Venice Arts$52,00051%
Project Angel Food$47,60030%
Kehillat Israel Reconstructionist Congregation of Pacific Palisades$35,0002n/a
The Archer School for Girls Inc$30,00020%
The Gentle Barn Foundation$26,00030%
Anti-Defamation League$20,00020%
The Village School$17,50020%
Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts$15,00010%
Unatti Foundation$11,00022%
Manifestworks$10,68021%
Show all 29 grantees
All grantees of Kara Love Project by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Venice Arts$52,00051%
Project Angel Food$47,60030%
Kehillat Israel Reconstructionist Congregation of Pacific Palisades$35,0002n/a
The Archer School for Girls Inc$30,00020%
The Gentle Barn Foundation$26,00030%
Anti-Defamation League$20,00020%
The Village School$17,50020%
Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts$15,00010%
Unatti Foundation$11,00022%
Manifestworks$10,68021%
The Accountability Board Inc$10,00010%
Insightla Inc$7,5001n/a
Humane World for Animals Inc$6,00020%
Friends of Ramana's Garden$5,00014%
Agape International Spiritual Center of Truth Inc$5,0001n/a
Ica La$2,50010%
At the Well Project Inc$2,50010%
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service$2,50010%
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc$2,50010%
Hanuman Maui$2,00820%
Habits of Waste$2,00011%
Helpusadoptorg Inc$1,50010%
Concern Foundation$1,00010%
Chabad of Brentwood Inc$1,0001n/a
Children's Hospital Los Angeles$1,00010%
Insight Meditation Society Inc$1,0001n/a
Liberty Sanctuary$1,00010%
Community Systems Inc$1,00010%
Skirball Cultural Center$50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($24k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Kara Love Project supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVenice Arts: $52,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetProject Angel Food: $47,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Archer School for Girls Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Gentle Barn Foundation: $26,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Village School: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnatti Foundation: $11,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetManifestworks: $10,680 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Accountability Board Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Ramana's Garden: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetIca La: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAt the Well Project Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDidi Hirsch Psychiatric Service: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of United Hatzalah Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHanuman Maui: $2,008 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHabits of Waste: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHelpusadoptorg Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConcern Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiberty Sanctuary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Systems Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSkirball Cultural Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kara Love Project with peer funders

About Kara Love Project

How much does Kara Love Project give?
Kara Love Project reported 23 grants totaling $155,400 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 19 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Kara Love Project fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (18%), Religion (17%), Education (13%).
Who are Kara Love Project's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Venice Arts ($52k), Project Angel Food ($48k), Kehillat Israel Reconstructionist Congregation of Pacific Palisades ($35k).
Does Kara Love Project fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 84% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kara Love Project accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kara Love Project?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Annenberg Foundation, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, California Community Foundation.
Where is Kara Love Project based?
Kara Love Project is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kara Love Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph