Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kantor Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$214kReligion$107kHealth$63kInternational$57kHuman Services$55kAnimals$8kRecreation & Sports$7kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$6,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$15,000
GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY$15,000
ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE$7,500
CRANBROOK SCHOOLS$7,500
HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC$7,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL$4,000
CANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEY$2,500
JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$2,500
CAMP HAVAYA$1,500
GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVARD CLASS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 12%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ROUNDABOUT VALLEY ANIMALS FOR ADOPION: $4k → 16%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $10k → 21%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%INFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $12k → 19%TEMPLE SHA'AREY SHALOM: $5k → 10%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $10k → 21%TEMPLE SHA'AREY SHALOM: $5k → 10%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $8k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $5k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $5k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $5k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $5k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $5k → 28%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $5k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $5k → 28%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%EVERY CAT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 16 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$462k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +74%
  • GU
    GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • GO
    GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +367%

Funded once

  • ID
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
2
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
9
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Justin G Model Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $55,000 · OtherADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALEHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $55,000 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETYALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $37,500 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSCANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEY: $20,000 · OtherCANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEYJOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $15,000 · OtherINFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $41,600 · Other+13 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $83,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $32,000 · HealthGIFT OF L…MOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $6,400 · HealthMOVEMBER …JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthJUSTIN G …CHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $13,000 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsEVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · AnimalsTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$288,100Education$163,000Health$45,200Recreation & Sports$14,500Animals$4,000Public Benefit$1,000Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $83,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $6,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds EVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kantor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kantor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kantor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph