Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kantor Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$214kReligion$107kHealth$63kInternational$57kHuman Services$55kAnimals$8kRecreation & Sports$7kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$6,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$15,000
GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY$15,000
ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE$7,500
CRANBROOK SCHOOLS$7,500
HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC$7,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL$4,000
JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$2,500
CANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEY$2,500
GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA$1,500
CAMP HAVAYA$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVARD CLASS ENDOWMENT: $5k → 12%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ROUNDABOUT VALLEY ANIMALS FOR ADOPION: $4k → 16%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $10k → 21%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%INFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $12k → 19%TEMPLE SHA'AREY SHALOM: $5k → 10%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $10k → 21%TEMPLE SHA'AREY SHALOM: $5k → 10%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%JOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $8k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $5k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $5k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%CRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $5k → 21%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $8k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $8k → 28%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $5k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $5k → 28%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $5k → 10%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%ADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE: $5k → 28%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 9%EVERY CAT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$462k · 16 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$462k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +74%
  • GU
    GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +17%
  • GO
    GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +367%

Funded once

  • ID
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
2
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
9
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

12
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Justin G Model Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY — $55,000 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETYADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALE — $55,000 · OtherADATH ISRAEL OF RIVERDALEALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $42,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCRANBROOK SCHOOLS — $37,500 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSCANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEY — $20,000 · OtherCANCER CARE OF NEW JERSEYJOHN WAYNE CANCER CENTER — $15,000 · OtherINFECTIOUS DISEASE PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $41,600 · Other+13 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $83,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · EducationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY+1 more — $5,000 · EducationGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $32,000 · HealthGIFT OF L…MOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $6,400 · HealthMOVEMBER …JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthJUSTIN G …CHAI LIFELINE INC — $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,800 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $13,000 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsEVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · AnimalsTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC — $1,000 · Public BenefitPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $250 · Philanthropy
Other$288,100Education$163,000Health$45,200Recreation & Sports$14,500Animals$4,000Public Benefit$1,000Philanthropy$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $83,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $32,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $13,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $6,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds EVERYCAT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JUSTIN G MODEL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION
  • Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kantor Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph