Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kansky Walter & Ida Char Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$233kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$6kHealth$4k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$5,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
KIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
COE COLLEGE$5,000
UNIV OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION$5,000
CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST$4,000
PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
NATL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY$500
ST LUKES HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$500
ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA$500
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
CAMP COURAGEOUS$500
WAYPOINT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$253k
$0

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +57%
  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    State University of Iowa Foundation

    The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

    Education
    2
    State University of Iowa Alumni Association

    Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

    —
    3
    Grand View University

    Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

    Education
    4
    University of Iowa Research Foundation

    The university of iowa research foundation's (uirf) mission is to: advance, develop, increase and extend the progress of science and useful arts through encouraging and assisting investigation, research and education at the state…

    —
    5
    American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

    The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

    —
    6
    Cornell College

    Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

    Education
    7
    Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

    To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

    Community Improvement
    8
    Iowa State University Alumni Association

    To facilitate the lifetime connection of alumni, students, and friends with iowa state university and each other.

    Education
    9
    University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

    The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

    —
    10
    Upper Iowa University

    Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

    Education
    11
    Concordia University Chicago

    Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

    Education
    12
    Luther College

    Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of East Central Iowa; the most unlike its peers is Coe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $35,000 · OtherKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGECEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST: $10,000 · OtherCEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOLPRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherPRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOLTHOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherMETRO HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $5,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATIONIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCOE COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationCOE COLLEGE+1 more: $3,500 · EducationWAYPOINT SERVICES: $4,000 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $3,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Health
    Other$119,500Education$118,500Human Services$7,500Arts & Culture$4,000Health$3,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds COE COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC ↗
    • Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA ↗
    • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds THE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Fire Group Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Kansky Walter & Ida Char Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kansky Walter & Ida Char Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Kansky Walter & Ida Char’s filings →

      More from the funding graph