Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kansky Walter & Ida Char Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$233kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$6kHealth$4k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$5,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIV OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION$5,000
KIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
COE COLLEGE$5,000
CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST$4,000
PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
NATL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY$500
ST LUKES HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$500
CAMP COURAGEOUS$500
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA$500
WAYPOINT$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%WAYPOINT: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$253k · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$253k
$0

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +57%
  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    State University of Iowa Foundation

    The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

    Education
    2
    State University of Iowa Alumni Association

    Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

    3
    Grand View University

    Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

    Education
    4
    University of Iowa Research Foundation

    The university of iowa research foundation's (uirf) mission is to: advance, develop, increase and extend the progress of science and useful arts through encouraging and assisting investigation, research and education at the state…

    5
    American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

    The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

    6
    Cornell College

    Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

    Education
    7
    Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

    To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

    Community Improvement
    8
    Iowa State University Alumni Association

    To facilitate the lifetime connection of alumni, students, and friends with iowa state university and each other.

    Education
    9
    University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

    The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

    10
    Upper Iowa University

    Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

    Education
    11
    Concordia University Chicago

    Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

    Education
    12
    Luther College

    Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of East Central Iowa and the most unlike its peers is Coe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA — $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $35,000 · OtherKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGECEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST — $10,000 · OtherCEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL — $7,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOLPRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL — $7,000 · OtherPRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOLTHOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherMETRO HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $5,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATIONIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCOE COLLEGE — $35,000 · EducationCOE COLLEGE+1 more — $3,500 · EducationWAYPOINT SERVICES — $4,000 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA — $3,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Health
    Other$119,500Education$118,500Human Services$7,500Arts & Culture$4,000Health$3,500

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC — $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES — $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION
    • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    • Who funds COE COLLEGE
    • Who funds NATIONAL CZECH & SLOVAK MUSEUM & LIBRARY INC
    • Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES
    • Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA
    • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
    • Who funds THE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Fire Group Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Kansky Walter & Ida Char Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph