Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kampe Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$307kReligion$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kEnvironment$54kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$26kInternational$21kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
$4,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$12,000
VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION$10,000
LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD$10,000
WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD$10,000
CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT INC$7,000
FRIENDS OF THE PAONIA LIBRARY$7,000
HALF MOON BAY HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS ATHLETICS CORP$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$5,000
CABRILLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
POLARIS$5,000
USO$5,000
PALESTINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
THE RIGHT WAY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%PALESTINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%EDDY HOUSE: $3k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT INC: $7k → 14%WILDFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE: $5k → 15%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
NY
OR
NV
SD
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$502k · 24 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
36

Total granted

$502k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEARNING COUNCIL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $196k · revenue +220% · 28% of their budget
  • WE
    WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD
    5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +50%
  • PP
    POLARIS PROJECT
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Naturebridge

To connect young people to the wonder and science of the natural world, igniting self-discovery and inspiring stewardship of our planet.

Environment
2
Mountains 2 Sea

Our mission is to empower youth using outdoor adventure learning to help them achieve their personal potential. Through outings in the mountains and on the sea, participants will develop a strong foundation for personal health and…

Youth Development
3
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps

Rocky mountain youth corps engages young people in the outdoors, inspiring them to use their strengths and potential to lead healthy, productive lives. we teach responsibility for self, community, and environment through teamwork, service,…

Youth Development
4
LandPaths

LandPaths' mission is to foster a love of the land in Sonoma County. LandPaths creates ways for people to experience the beauty, understand the value, and assist in healing the land in their local communities.

Environment
5
Cal-Wood Education Center

Offer unique outdoor education experiences to youth and adults. Since 1982 the organization has inspired a greater apprecation for the natural world; offers unique educational opportuntities to those who would not otheriwise experience…

Environment
6
Woodcraft Rangers

The goals of woodcraft's nvision after school program are to decrease risk factors impinging on children and youth and to increase their chances for success in school and in life through youth development programs for low income and/or…

—
7
Eastern Sierra Conservation Corps

ESCC provides opportunities for at-risk, underserved youth, and young adults, from marginalized populations to experience and better understand their wilderness natural resources. ESCC provides programs that inform the general public about…

Environment
8
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
9
Conservation Corps North Bay Inc

To develop youth and conserve natural resources for a resilient, sustainable, and equitable community.

Employment
10
Boojum Institute for Experiential Education

Boojum institute for experiential education offers environmental education and leadership development programs for youth and adults. boojum's comprehensive experiential education programs-facilitated in all of the four major ecosystems.

—
11
Recreation Northwest

We teach the health benefits of nature, promote outdoor recreation, and steward the places where we play.

Recreation & Sports
12
Teens Inc

Teens, inc. supports, educates, and empowers youth and their families to make healthy choices and thrive.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Colorado Migrant and Rural Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
19/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH FORK SCHOOL OF INTEGRATED STUDIES: $39,750 · OtherNORTH FORK SCHOOL OF INTEGRATED STUDIESDELTA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 50J: $36,860 · OtherDELTA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 50JLUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD: $32,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNODWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD: $32,000 · OtherWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNODIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL: $14,000 · Other+46 more: $188,272 · Other+46 moreTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $196,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING COUNCIL+3 more: $8,000 · EducationChildren of the Night: $7,000 · Human ServicesPalestinian American Community Cent: $5,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF NFSIS: $4,500 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE: $3,000 · Human ServicesAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentGroundwork: $1,750 · EnvironmentNORTH FORK VALLEY CREATIVE COALITION: $7,420 · Arts & CultureBLUE SAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH FORK VALLEY PUBLIC RADIO INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCELEBRATE THE BEAT: $2,000 · Arts & CultureARTS ALLIANCE INC: $1,671 · Arts & CultureHALF MOON BAY HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS ATHLETICS CORP: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsCOLORADO CANYONS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsHALF MOON BAY GIRLS SOFTBALL INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsMACH ACADEMY INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,000 · Religion
Other$391,882Education$204,000Human Services$32,000Environment$31,750Arts & Culture$17,591Recreation & Sports$13,000Religion$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $196,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHALF MOON BAY HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS ATHLETICS CORP: $8,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH FORK VALLEY CREATIVE COALITION: $7,420 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetChildren of the Night: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget4 Leg Adventures: $5,750 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetNFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Rightway Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPalestinian American Community Cent: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NFSIS: $4,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAIN STREET SCHOLARS: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLUE SAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH AND NATURE: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOLORADO CANYONS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH FORK VALLEY PUBLIC RADIO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA VOCATIONS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER MANUFACTURING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALF MOON BAY GIRLS SOFTBALL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBurn Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInner Roads Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCELEBRATE THE BEAT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGroundwork: $1,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARTS ALLIANCE INC: $1,671 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACH ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH FORK BOOSTERS CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LEARNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD ↗
  • Who funds VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HALF MOON BAY HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS ATHLETICS CORP ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FORK VALLEY CREATIVE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds 4 Leg Adventures ↗
  • Who funds NFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rightway Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Palestinian American Community Cent ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NFSIS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Western Colorado Community Foundation IncCO19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Jay P K Kenney Foundation The Kenney Family Foundation · The Goodwin Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kampe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kampe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kampe Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kampe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kampe Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph