Skip to content
Kaller Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Kaller Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$65kInternational$41kArts & Culture$13kHealth$10kReligion$8kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEHOLD AREA OPEN DOOR$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $100 → 6%FULFILL FOODBANK: $1k → 6%THE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK: $250 → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND INC: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 15 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +193% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$125k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+193%
+43%

Still filing today

60%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2018–2019 · $39k · revenue +206%
  • LUNCH BREAK INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $35k · revenue +193%
  • FA
    Freehold Area Open Door Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +356%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MONMOUTH BATTLEFIELD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF THE SHORE
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

The spirit that infuses newark beth israel medical center and children's hospital of new jersey is its commitment to excellence. our mission is to achieve this excellence through: - the delivery of primary health care to all who need our…

Health
2
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
4
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center Inc

Muhlenberg regional medical center is committed to excellence in

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
7
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
8
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates

The organizations are committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
9
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
10
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
11
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
24/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $38,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVI…+3 more: $2,500 · International+3 moreFRIENDS OF MONMOUTH BATTLEFIELD INC: $8,700 · OtherFRIENDS OF MONMOUTH BATTLEFIELD …FULFILL FOODBANK MONMOUTH AND OCEAN: $5,000 · OtherFULFILL FOODBANK MONMOUTH AND OC…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,250 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYBATTLEGROUND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,800 · OtherBATTLEGROUND HISTORICAL SOCIETYCHABAD OF THE SHORE: $3,500 · OtherCHABAD OF THE SHOREHELENE WHITMAN MEMORIAL CANCER FUND: $2,800 · OtherHELENE WHITMAN MEMORIAL CANCER F…MARKET STREET MISSION INC: $2,100 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION: $1,800 · OtherRUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE NJ: $1,750 · Other+20 more: $10,530 · Other+20 moreLUNCH BREAK INC: $35,385 · Food & NutritionLUNCH BREAK INCFreehold Area Open Door Inc: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterFreehold Area Ope…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $2,900 · Human ServicesTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $1,000 · Human Services180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC: $250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 · Human ServicesNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,800 · PhilanthropyJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $200 · HealthMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $100 · Health
International$41,000Other$44,230Food & Nutrition$35,385Housing & Shelter$23,000Human Services$4,850Philanthropy$2,800Health$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $38,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $35,385 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFreehold Area Open Door Inc: $23,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,250 over 4y, 12% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $2,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMonmouth Beach First Aid Squad Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH BEACH FIRE COMPANY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY PARK LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY PARK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN PHILATELIC SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jules L Plangere Jr F…The Ansell Grimm & Aa…New Jersey Natural Ga…Oceanfirst FoundationVerizon FoundationThe Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jules L Plangere Jr Fam Fdn IncNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jules L Plangere Jr Fam Fdn Inc · The Ansell Grimm & Aaron Foundation Inc · New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaller Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaller Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 61%
  • The Center in Asbury Park Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • 180 Turning Lives Around: 61% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • American Littoral Society: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaller Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home