Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kakani Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$218kEducation$116kReligion$21kPublic Benefit$20kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY$53,278
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$9,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER$4,034
AAPIQLI$2,500
MOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU$1,975
MEDICAL SOCIETY OF THE STATE OF NEW$1,600
Individual grant recipient$1,400
LONG ISLAND INDO AMERICAN LIONS$1,215
WNYC$1,200
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS$742
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$500
RAJMAAI$500
ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA$300
THE HINDU TEMPLE$217
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA: $300 → 6%PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 22 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
41

Total granted

$211k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+42%

Still filing today

32%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MPMAANA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +97%
  • MM
    MERCY MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +19%
  • OF
    OM FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IA
    INDO AMERICAN LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • UI
    UNIVERSITY IN DENVER
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indian Medical Society of New Jersey Inc
Health
2
American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin

To update and educate members of the medical profession on current activities and new products.

Health
3
New Jersey State Aapi

To facilitate and enable indian american physicians to excel in patient care, teaching and research

Human Services
4
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
5
National Ayurvedic Medical Association

The National Ayurvedic Medical Association represents the Ayurvedic profession in the United States of America. Our mission is to preserve, protect, promote and advance the consciousness-based philosophy, knowledge, science and practice of…

Community Improvement
6
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
7
International Hindu University Inc

Our mission as per the by-laws : a) the board adopts a strategic plan that includes goals which will lead to acquiring accreditation recognized by us department of education and maintaining it. this includes getting an accreditation from…

Religion
8
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
9
Vedic Preservation Initiative Chhabra

Maintened a website to document and present our research, popular vedic popularvedicscience.com. added 200 new articles and the website is now a top ranking site

Arts & Culture
10
Indian Institute of Science Alumi Association of North America

We are the alumni of the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, who live and/or work in North America, which includes the USA, Canada and Mexico. Our goal is to garner the best and the brightest minds in Science and Technology from…

Education
11
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
12
Layyasaaram Institute Ofindian Arts

Layyasaaram institute of indian arts was established with three primary goals. perform: conduct indidan classical music and dance performances of local and visiting atistis in the twin cities and rochester metro areas. educate: conduct…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Vegan Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS: $101,200 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANSAMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY: $53,278 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGYXAVIER ADMISSIONS LLC: $35,000 · OtherXAVIER ADMISSIONS LLCINDO AMERICAN LIONS CLUB: $20,000 · OtherINDO AMERICAN LIONS CLUBUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $19,771 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLEUNIVERSITY IN DENVER: $15,000 · OtherMAHESHWARY MAHASABHA OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $14,695 · OtherMOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU: $12,975 · Other+50 more: $72,246 · Other+50 moreMPMAANA INC: $19,530 · HealthMPMAANA I…MERCY MEDICAL CENTER: $12,835 · HealthMERCY MED…OM FOUNDATION INC: $2,115 · HealthOM FOUNDA…+2 more: $602 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9,000 · EducationNew York University: $7,000 · EducationAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $742 · Education+2 more: $744 · EducationNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,400 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,002 · Arts & CultureINDIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND: $250 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $89 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC: $300 · Human ServicesPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC: $100 · Human ServicesEDU-GIRLS INC: $200 · InternationalGOFUNDMEORG: $200 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $120 · Environment
Other$344,165Health$35,082Education$17,486Arts & Culture$2,741Human Services$400International$200Philanthropy$200Environment$120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMPMAANA INC: $19,530 over 5y, 12% of budgetMAHESHWARY MAHASABHA OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $14,695 over 1y, 23% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL CENTER: $12,835 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOM FOUNDATION INC: $2,115 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $742 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VEGAN VISION INC: $275 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW YORK CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATHCOUNTS Foundation: $244 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDR RAMESH KUMAR FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDO AMERICAN ARTS COUNCIL INC: $89 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MPMAANA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAHESHWARY MAHASABHA OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds OM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arya Family FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arya Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kakani Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kakani Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kakani Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kakani Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kakani Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph