· Private foundation
K&F Baxter Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| PACIFIC COUNCIL OF INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| MADERA ELEMENTARY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| ST MONICA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| EL CERRITO HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES | $30,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| STAND TOGETHER TRUST INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| COALITION FOR HUMAN IMMIGRANT | $20,000 |
| ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC | $15,000 |
| VILLAGE SCHOOL GENERAL OPERATING | $12,500 |
| CEDAR SINAI MEDICAL CENTER | $12,500 |
| SIERRA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PLACER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT | $10,000 |
| AUBURN SYMPHONY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BNBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +44%
- AAALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +789%
- MEMadera Elementary Foundation4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- TMTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELESone grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +22%
- SJSAINT JOHNS HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2024 · $50k
- NCNEVADA CITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…
See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…
To foster relationships among alumni, students and community by providing services and activities that build loyalty, support and a lifelong connection to the university.
To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Portal Schools ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Madera Elementary Foundation ↗
- Who funds Step One School ↗
- Who funds Sierra College Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds COLLABORISING INC ↗
- Who funds Placer High School Music Boosters Club ↗
- Who funds NEVADA CITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds AUBURN CIVIC SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The California Endowment · Weingart Foundation · Johnny Carson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization K&F Baxter Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to K&F Baxter Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to K&F Baxter Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.