Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

K & E Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$49kHousing & Shelter$33kHuman Services$33kReligion$19kCivil Rights$15kPublic Benefit$15kCrime & Legal$4kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$11,590
STAR OF HOPE MISSION$11,590
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$1,500
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$1,500
PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION$1,000
HOUSTON CHRISTIAN BROADCASTERS INC$1,000
HOUSTON PREGNANCY HELP CENTER$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$1,000
TRUE THE VOTE$750
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$600
MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUSTON PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
KY
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of K & E Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 67% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

K & E Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$163k · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$163k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+17%

Still filing today

82%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHealthPublic BenefitPhilanthropyReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2019–2025 · $21k · revenue +126%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +99%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Blue Bird Circle
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +5%
  • IM
    Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houstongraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +179%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

2
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
3
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
4
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

5
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
8
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
9
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
10
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersEducation Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity FoundationsPublic University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesRotary Club FoundationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Christian Missionary Organi…Government Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr10%39%35–55yr13%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr13%62%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,769

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $32,623 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPRISON FELLOWSHIP — $11,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPTURNING POINT USA INC — $5,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCTITUS COUNTY CARES INC DBA TITUS COUNTY CARES — $2,500 · OtherCANCARE INC — $4,000 · OtherCANCARE INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $3,500 · Other+19 more — $15,200 · Other+19 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $21,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESE…The Blue Bird Circle — $5,500 · HealthThe Blue Bird CircleSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $32,951 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE MISSIONALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $9,500 · Civil RightsALLIANCE …DEFENDING EDUCATION — $3,750 · Civil RightsDEFENDING…AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE-MIDWEST INC — $750 · Civil RightsTRUE THE VOTE INC — $750 · Civil RightsLeadership Institute — $4,750 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $1,500 · Public BenefitCONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA — $500 · Public BenefitThe Periwinkle Foundation — $5,500 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $750 · PhilanthropyHouston Christian Broadcasters Inc — $7,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,323Health$37,500Housing & Shelter$32,951Civil Rights$14,750Public Benefit$9,250Philanthropy$7,250Arts & Culture$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $32,951 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Christian Broadcasters Inc — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Periwinkle Foundation — $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Blue Bird Circle — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANCARE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDEFENDING EDUCATION — $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTITUS COUNTY CARES INC DBA TITUS COUNTY CARES — $2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE-MIDWEST INC — $750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION-TEXAS CHAPTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIWANIS FOUNDATION OF HOUSTON — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Servant Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization K & E Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to K & E Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to K & E Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph