Skip to content

· Private foundation

K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$350kRecreation & Sports$52kInternational$44kArts & Culture$29kEnvironment$24kPhilanthropy$5kReligion$1k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$772k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$10,000
LEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTS$10,000
UNION COLLEGE$10,000
PURCHASE COLLEGE FDN$6,000
EMELIN THEATRE$4,500
POWER MY LEARNING$4,000
MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FDN$3,000
RAILS TO TRAILS CONVERSANCY$3,000
STUDENT AID FUND$3,000
AFS USA$3,000
TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA$2,500
MAMARONECK PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $5k → 22%EMELIN THEATRE: $5k → 9%UNION COLLEGE: $20k → 12%POWER MY LEARNING: $14k → 17%RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $6k → 14%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%POWER MY LEARNING: $7k → 17%RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $6k → 14%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%POWER MY LEARNING: $7k → 17%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%POWER MY LEARNING: $5k → 17%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 12%LEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTS: $10k → 14%LEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTS: $8k → 14%AFS USA: $10k → 17%LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS: $8k → 14%AFS USA: $6k → 17%LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS: $8k → 14%MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%AFS USA: $6k → 17%LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS: $5k → 14%MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%AFS USA: $5k → 17%LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS: $5k → 14%STUDENT AID FUND: $5k → 9%AFS USA: $5k → 17%MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%AFS USA: $5k → 17%MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%AFS USA: $5k → 17%STUDENT AID FUND: $5k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $15k → 9%PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $8k → 9%PURCHASE COLLEGE FDN: $8k → 9%Purchase College Foundation: $7k → 9%PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%PURCHASE COLLEGE FDN: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$500k · 15 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$500k
$2k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationScience & TechInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    7× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +15%
  • MS
    MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +2%
  • LO
    League of American Wheelman Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • LT
    LARCHMONT TEMPLE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • E
    EDUPLN
    one grant, 2017 · $599
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
8
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
9
Trustees of Union College in the Town of Schenectady in the State of New York

Union college, chartered by the state of new york in 1795, is one of the nation's oldest and most distinguished liberal arts colleges with engineering. consistently ranked among the nation's top colleges, union is a leader in educating…

Education
10
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Purchase College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rails to Trails Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION COLLEGE: $78,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGECarnegie Mellon University: $78,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityLEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTS: $17,500 · OtherLEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTSSTUDENT AID FUND: $16,000 · OtherSTUDENT AID FUNDTRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $12,500 · OtherTRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA+4 more: $10,599 · OtherPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $60,500 · EducationPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATI…MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · EducationMAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDA…MAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $11,000 · EducationMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUD…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationPowerMyLearning Inc: $49,000 · Science & TechPowerMyLear…AFS-USA INC: $44,000 · InternationalAFS-USA I…League of American Wheelman Inc: $34,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE EMELIN THEATRE: $29,000 · Arts & CultureRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $24,000 · Environment
Other$212,599Education$111,500Science & Tech$49,000International$44,000Recreation & Sports$34,000Arts & Culture$29,000Environment$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $78,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $60,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPowerMyLearning Inc: $49,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAFS-USA INC: $44,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetLeague of American Wheelman Inc: $34,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EMELIN THEATRE: $29,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $11,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PowerMyLearning Inc ↗
  • Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds League of American Wheelman Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE EMELIN THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman Foundation · Lake Road Foundation · The Toby and Nataly Ritter Family Foundation · Glff Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on K & M Weisburgh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph