Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jutostgraham Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MCrime & Legal$900kEducation$405kHealth$310kPublic Benefit$300kHuman Services$250kEnvironment$110kScience & Tech$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Campaign Legal Center$100,000
Association to Benefit Children$25,000
Bard College$25,000
Pen American Center$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Modern Artlife Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Association to Benefit Children: $100k → 17%Association to Benefit Children: $100k → 17%Association to Benefit Children: $25k → 17%Association to Benefit Children: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 14 repeat orgs$461k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$3.1M
$456k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $900k · revenue +349%
  • NY
    NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $324k · revenue +62%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $310k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • UF
    UTAH FILM CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • T5
    THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
2
The American Playwriting Foundation
—
3
Roger Shapiro Fund for New Music
Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
6
Manhattan Theatre Club Inc

Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…

Arts & Culture
7
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
8
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
9
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
10
The Kranzberg Arts Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global…

Arts & Culture
12
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Tom Gold Dance Foundation 51 West 81ST Street. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%28%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,736

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC — $900,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INCTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $300,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INCNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC — $323,920 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INCMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $300,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association…UTAH FILM CENTER — $150,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTERTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $71,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $200,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIG…NATIONAL POETRY SERIES INC — $85,000 · OtherNATIONAL POETRY S…Individual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer — $60,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Ke…Memriaorg — $50,000 · OtherMemriaorgFifty Second Street Project — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherFriends of Apie Inc — $25,000 · Other+1 more — $10,000 · OtherBARD COLLEGE — $310,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $70,000 · EducationThe New York…Clemente Course in the Humanities Inc — $25,000 · EducationClemente Cou…ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN — $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $110,000 · EnvironmentPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Crime & Legal$1,200,000Arts & Culture$944,920Other$555,000Education$405,000Human Services$250,000Environment$110,000Philanthropy$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC — $900,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC — $323,920 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $310,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN — $250,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $110,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL POETRY SERIES INC — $85,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA MADDALENA FOUNDATION INC CO BARBARA SPENCE — $25,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClemente Course in the Humanities Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetEN GARDE ARTS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TOM GOLD DANCE FOUNDATION 51 WEST 81ST STREET — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jutostgraham Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jutostgraham Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jutostgraham Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home