Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jung Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$17kRecreation & Sports$15kHuman Services$11kReligion$7kInternational$7kFood & Nutrition$5kArts & Culture$2kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$850
Median grant
7
States reached
$196k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION SMILE$4,950
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$900
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA$900
NATIONAL VIETNAM WAR MUSEUM$850
USO$800
VIETNAM VETERANS FOUNDATION$800
Individual grant recipient$700
WORLD WAR II MUSEUM$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $1k → 11%FOUR OAKS: $600 → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $500 → 11%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $1k → 9%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $300 → 11%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $500 → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
IA
IN
CT
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 16 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$57k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +60%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +21%
  • CM
    CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +83%
  • JT
    JUNGS TAE KWON DO BLACK BELT ASSN
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • CR
    CEDAR RAPIDS KOREAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center for Victims of Torture

The center for victims of torture works to heal the wounds of torture on individuals, their families and their communities and to stop torture worldwide.

International
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
4
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
7
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Veterans Medical Research Foundation of San Diego

Honoring military service with science; our bench-to-bedside approach has led to breakthroughs in areas such as shingles prevention, heart disease, metabolic diseases and ground breaking work on post-traumatic stress disorder.

Health
12
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Las Vegas Victims' Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNGS BLACK BELT ASSOCIATION: $14,500 · OtherJUNGS BLACK BELT ASSOCIATIONJUNGS TAE KWON DO BLACK BELT ASSN: $3,000 · OtherJUNGS TAE KWON DO BLACK BELT ASSNCEDAR RAPIDS KOREAN CHURCH: $2,001 · OtherCEDAR RAPIDS KOREAN CHURCHCEDAR RAPIDS KOREAN BAPTIST CHURCH: $1,800 · OtherJANE BOYD COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherCEDAR ROCK KOREAN CHURCH: $1,301 · Other+22 more: $11,570 · Other+22 moreOPERATION SMILE INC: $18,780 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $4,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INCCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,200 · InternationalCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $1,800 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $600 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $650 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthNATIONAL VIETNAM WAR MUSEUM INC: $2,300 · Arts & CultureVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $1,400 · Public BenefitDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $300 · Public BenefitCHRISTIAN CULTURE COMMUNITY: $1,000 · Religion
Other$37,172International$30,480Human Services$5,400Health$2,350Arts & Culture$2,300Public Benefit$1,700Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $18,780 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL VIETNAM WAR MUSEUM INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJANE BOYD COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CULTURE COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMANG SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOREVER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VIETNAM WAR MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds JANE BOYD COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CULTURE COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOMANG SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOREVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hawkeye Area Community Action Program IncIA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Maurice Paul and Glennys Brimmer Foundation · David Neuhaus Family Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jung Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jung Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jung Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph