Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maurice Paul and Glennys Brimmer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$522k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of MAURICE PAUL AND GLENNYS BRIMMER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $350k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC WORKER HOUSE$50,000
CEDAR RAPIDS POLICE PROTECTIVE CHARITY$50,000
I KNOW JACK FOUNDATION$50,000
MATTHEW 25$50,000
ST LUKES FOUNDATION$50,000
NEWBO CITY MARKET$50,000
GREEN SQUARE MEALS$50,000
HELPING HANDS$25,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$25,000
MERCY FAMILY CAREGIVER$25,000
MISSION OF HOPE$20,000
IOWA GIVING CREW$20,000
SATURDAY EVENING MEALS PROGRAM (SEMP)$10,000
FISCHER FOOD PANTRY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $405k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $10k → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $10k → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $10k → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $10k → 11%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $10k → 11%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $20k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $20k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $10k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $10k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $5k → 9%RED CROSS: $10k → 9%RED CROSS: $5k → 9%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $50k → 9%YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK: $20k → 9%YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK: $20k → 9%YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK: $10k → 9%YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK: $10k → 9%YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK: $10k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $60k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $50k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $25k → 9%FOUR OAKS: $10k → 9%FOUR OAKS: $5k → 9%FOUR OAKS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 37 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
6

Total granted

$3.3M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+139%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Green Square Meals Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $281k · revenue +203% · 34% of their budget
  • M2
    MATTHEW 25
    3× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue +40%
  • IK
    I KNOW JACK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +125% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYPOINT SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • CR
    CEDAR RAPIDS PARKINSONS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • HH
    HIS HANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
2
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
3
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
4
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

5
Iowa City Hospice Inc

To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.

Human Services
6
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

7
House of Hope Midwest

The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.

Human Services
8
Central Iowa Hospital Corporation

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
9
Iowa River Hospice Inc

Provide hospice care and bereavement support services.

Human Services
10
Central Iowa Shelter & Services

The organization endeavors to provide safe emergency and transitional shelter and meals to homeless adults along with resource assistance to move clients beyond homelessness and toward independent living.

Housing & Shelter
11
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

12
Iowa Chapter of Children's Advocacy Centers

To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is I Know Jack Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr13%22%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr22%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%5%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%31%10–20yr13%27%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr22%9%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
10%
115/1,143

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC WORKER HOUSE — $375,000 · OtherCATHOLIC WORKER HOUSEOLIVET MISSION — $320,000 · OtherOLIVET MISSIONGreen Square Meals Inc — $280,843 · OtherGreen Square Meals IncBOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $215,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBECUMENICAL COMMUNITY CENTER - HELPING HANDS — $130,000 · OtherECUMENICAL COMMUNITY CENTER - HELPING HANDSHELPING HANDS — $125,000 · OtherST LUKES FOUNDATION — $115,000 · OtherMATTHEW 25 MINISTRY — $110,000 · OtherMetro Catholic Outreach — $85,000 · Other+21 more — $665,000 · Other+21 moreMATTHEW 25 — $135,000 · Human ServicesMATTHEW 25YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK — $70,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG PARENTS…CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesCATHERINE MCA…CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA — $50,000 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEO…WAYPOINT SERVICES — $50,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT SERV…FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesI KNOW JACK FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · HealthI KNOW JACK …COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC — $75,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HE…HOUSE OF HOPE — $65,000 · HealthHOUSE OF HOP…HIS HANDS MINISTRIES — $60,000 · HealthHIS HANDS MI…TANAGER PLACE — $60,000 · HealthTANAGER PLAC…Mission of Hope — $180,000 · Crime & LegalNEWBO CITY MARKET — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,420,843Human Services$405,000Health$385,000Crime & Legal$180,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGreen Square Meals Inc — $280,843 over 8y, 34% of budgetMission of Hope — $180,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetMATTHEW 25 — $135,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetI KNOW JACK FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC — $75,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG PARENTS NETWORK — $70,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE — $65,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC — $65,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetHIS HANDS MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTANAGER PLACE — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA GIVING CREW — $55,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEWBO CITY MARKET — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Green Square Meals Inc
  • Who funds Mission of Hope
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25
  • Who funds I KNOW JACK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Metro Catholic Outreach
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds YOUNG PARENTS NETWORK
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE
  • Who funds CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC
  • Who funds HIS HANDS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds TANAGER PLACE
  • Who funds IOWA GIVING CREW
  • Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA
  • Who funds NEWBO CITY MARKET
  • Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES
  • Who funds FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI40.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · David Neuhaus Family Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Mercy Medical Center · John P & Lawrence J Giacoletto Fnd · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc · The Accel Foundation · Carleen and Eugene Grandon Charitable Foundation · Lavern T Busse & Audrey Busse Foundation · United Fire Group Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maurice Paul and Glennys Brimmer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maurice Paul and Glennys Brimmer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Maurice Paul and Glennys Brimmer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph