· Public charity
Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS
To develop, strengthen, and learn from nonprofit, philanthropic, public, as well as other projects, organizations, and networks that benefit society by advancing civic engagement, community-building, culture, education, religion, service, and social activism, in order to create a more just, inclusive, equitable, and resilient world.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $511,553 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $527,465 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,912 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $386k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA Jewish Film Festival LAJF | $232,953 |
| Beloved Builders | $103,425 |
| Camp Tawonga | $50,000 |
| Temple Beth Am | $30,000 |
| Other amounts less than 5000 | $23,225 |
| CHI TRIBE | $19,998 |
| MECHON HADAR | $15,422 |
| The Mothers Creative | $12,788 |
| Bnai David-Judea Congregatio | $10,000 |
| Jewish Free Loan Chicago | $6,973 |
| ADOPTION & JEWISH IDENTITY | $6,769 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPROJECTCAMP2× · 2021–2022 · $511k · revenue +35% · 48% of their budget
- JFJewish Free Loan Chicago Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $257k · revenue +17% · 86% of their budget
- NLNew Lehrhaus The Bay Area Hub for Adult Jewish Learning2× · 2022–2023 · $253k · revenue +122% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- JSJEWISH SOCIAL RESPONSE CUNone grant, 2020 · $102k
- CCCFAone grant, 2019 · $94k
- JSJewish Social Responseone grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…
A non-profit organization An inclusive platform designed to empower individuals to explore embrace and celebrate their Jewish identity through easeful joyful and social experiences
Central NJ Judaic Studies Initiative is a non-profit organization that was established to provide the infrastructure for an after-school religious program for children of elementary school age level. The goal is to encourage Jewish…
The CCJCC serves as a welcoming entry door into greater Jewish involvement. We are inclusive and engage both the unaffiliated as well as the affiliated members of our community. We embrace diversity and actively support creative approaches…
To build and strengthen the Jewish community, to provide cultural, educational, social and recreational opportunities for a deeper commitment to, and greater participation in Jewish life in Sonoma County.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tawonga Jewish Community Corporation and the most unlike its peers is New Lehrhaus the Bay Area Hub for Adult Jewish Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECTCAMP ↗
- Who funds Jewish Free Loan Chicago Inc ↗
- Who funds New Lehrhaus The Bay Area Hub for Adult Jewish Learning ↗
- Who funds GOOD DEED CORPS ↗
- Who funds BELOVED BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Center for Justice ↗
- Who funds COLAB ↗
- Who funds TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOTHERS CREATIVE ↗
- Who funds Jewish Social Response ↗
- Who funds Conejo Health ↗
- Who funds SANDRA CAPLAN COMMUNITY BET DIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Covenant Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS?
Find your warmest path to Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.