Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jumpstart Inc

JUMPSTART INC.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Community Improvement$11MScience & Tech$220kEducation$94kYouth Development$80kFood & Nutrition$80kHealth$41kEmployment$40kCrime & Legal$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$130,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$130,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER: $150k → 14%AKRON URBAN LEAGUE: $133k → 13%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER: $105k → 14%AKRON URBAN LEAGUE: $130k → 13%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER: $100k → 14%AKRON URBAN LEAGUE: $120k → 13%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%AKRON URBAN LEAGUE: $54k → 13%GREATER STARK CITY URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 13%GREATER STARK CITY URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 13%CENTER OF HOPE FAMILY SRV: $5k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $42k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $30k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $20k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.8M · 41 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
88

Total granted

$9.8M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

71%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitEmploymentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GROWTH OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +40% · 60% of their budget
  • TN
    THE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2018–2025 · $646k · revenue +269%
  • EA
    ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $561k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +6%
  • GA
    GREATER AKRON CHAMBERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +58%
  • IS
    IC STARS COLUMBUS
    one grant, 2018 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
4
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—
5
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
6
Columbus Compact Corporation

Columbus compact is a catalyst for positive development of central city columbus' neighborhoods and business districts.

Community Improvement
7
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
8
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
9
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
10
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership, advocacy and member services that foster growth and economic prosperity for our region.

—
11
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
12
Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce

The quad cities chamber of commerce is a combined chamber of commerce, economic, and community development organization serving the greater quad cities region. the quad cities chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen and enhance the…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Presidents Council Business Chamber. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr16%41%35–55yr22%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr16%34%10–20yr15%10%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr22%23%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/127
the rest of the field
12%
3,273/26,664

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
31/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GROWTH OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS INC — $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementGROWTH OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS INCTHE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $646,000 · Community ImprovementTHE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVEL…DAYTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATION & PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FDTN — $486,000 · Community ImprovementDAYTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATION & PUBLIC IM…CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $460,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATIONPRESIDENTS COUNCIL BUSINESS CHAMBER — $432,500 · Community ImprovementPRESIDENTS COUNCIL BUSINESS CHAMBERWESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC — $380,000 · Community ImprovementWESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC+10 more — $985,200 · Community Improvement+10 moreECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $560,924 · OtherECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN…URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $262,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELANDTOLEDO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $153,800 · OtherFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $150,000 · Other+98 more — $2,309,670 · Other+98 moreAKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC — $437,000 · Human ServicesAKRON COMM…URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC — $430,130 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAG…INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC — $107,100 · Human ServicesINCLUSIVE …GREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesGREATER ST…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesCENTERSTATE CEO FOUNDATION INC — $531,488 · Public BenefitGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION) — $217,976 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC — $442,000 · Social ScienceOHIO AEROSPACE INSTITUTE — $220,071 · Science & TechPRESIDENTS COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC — $111,000 · EmploymentASSETS TOLEDO — $101,600 · Employment
Community Improvement$5,389,700Other$3,436,394Human Services$1,054,230Public Benefit$749,464Social Science$442,000Science & Tech$220,071Employment$212,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGROWTH OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS INC — $2,000,000 over 3y, 60% of budgetTHE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $646,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $560,924 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCENTERSTATE CEO FOUNDATION INC — $531,488 over 4y, 72% of budgetDAYTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATION & PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FDTN — $486,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $460,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC — $442,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC — $437,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC — $430,130 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetWESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC — $380,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $262,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetOHIO AEROSPACE INSTITUTE — $220,071 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION) — $217,976 over 2y, 15% of budgetNYBDC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $167,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGreater Cleveland Partnership — $161,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOhio Minority Supplier Development Council — $160,100 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetTOLEDO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $153,800 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC — $151,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC — $107,100 over 4y, 26% of budgetASSETS TOLEDO — $101,600 over 4y, 42% of budgetGREATER AKRON CHAMBER — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $95,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $94,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC — $75,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF THE CAPITAL REGION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCIFT — $65,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWOMENS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY — $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLORAIN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHillman Accelerator — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCleveland Development Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetUNITED BLACK FUND OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBRARY LEGACY FOUNDATION OF THE TOLEDO-LUCAS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Gund Found…Burton D Morgan Found…The Cleveland Foundat…Cleveland Development…Dollar Bank FoundationToledo Community Foun…Neighborhood Progress…The Good Community Fo…Saint Lukes Foundatio…The Westfield Insuran…Dominion Energy Chari…Columbus Foundation
The George Gund FoundationOH22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Cleveland Development Advisors Community Reinvestment Fund Inc · Dollar Bank Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Neighborhood Progress Inc · The Good Community Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Columbus Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jumpstart Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines