How much did JUMPSTART INC grant in FY2025?

Community Improvement$5.4MHuman Services$1.1MSocial Science$442kScience & Tech$220kPublic Benefit$218kEmployment$213kEducation$174kPhilanthropy$150kHousing & Shelter$70kOther$3.3M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

prosperityresearchindustryself-relianceensuringjobsgrowth

2020

librarymedicalprosperityresearchflowerleadershipoutcomes

2021

scheduleneededself-relianceensuringurban leagueblacklevel

2022

inclusivehandafricancleveland'sthrivepersonssolutions

2023

customcakestoledonorthwestnetworkingcapitalsmall business

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$130,000

Median grant

States reached

$89M

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$130,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.8M · 41 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.8M

$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%

+73%

Still filing today

68%

15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentSocial ScienceScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NO
NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
7× · 2018–2025 · $646k · revenue +514%
EC
ECON & COMM DEV INST ECDI
6× · 2018–2023 · $561k · revenue +144%
DA
DAYTON AREA CHAMBER EPI
4× · 2018–2021 · $486k · revenue +3%

Funded once

LOCAL INITIATIVE SUPPORT CORPORATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +135%
TF
THE FAITH IN STARK FUND
one grant, 2020 · $100k
GA
GREATER AKRON CHAMBERgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services

Greater Columbus Chamber of

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—

Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—

Ohio Business Leadership Network

—

Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—

Greater Concord Chamber of Commerce

The organization merges the talents, skills and resources of the area business community for the purpose of developing economic opportunities, strengthening the business climate and enhancing the quality of life for its membership.

—

Akron Development Corporation

The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through a program with the former akron global business accelerator, and to secure state of ohio financing…

Community Improvement

Greater Dayton Union Cooperative

Greater dayton union cooperative initiative inc incubates cooperative businesses to create and retain good jobs in our region, building a local economy that works for all.

Community Improvement

Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—

Chamber of Commerce of Greater West Chester Inc

The organization was formed to provide leadership concerning business issues impacting on the local economy and quality of life.

—

Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The dayton area chamber of commerce is formed to be the leading advocate for business in the dayton and miami valley regional area and strive to maximize business profitability of its members by providing: professional development,…

—

Greater Cleveland Media Development Corporation

To promote increased media production in Northeast Ohio using effective strategies for attraction and workforce development including building an artistic infrastructure through film.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber and the most unlike its peers is Syracuse University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%3/111

the rest of the field

10%

4,601/46,863

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/39

Grantees still filing

28/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Community Improvement$5,389,700Other$3,707,642Human Services$1,054,230Social Science$442,000Science & Tech$220,071Public Benefit$217,976Employment$212,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Gund FoundationOH24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · Fund for Our Economic Future Of · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Akron Community Foundation · Cleveland Development Advisors · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · The Good Community Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JUMPSTART INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE PRESIDENTS COUNCIL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 472195389 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE PRESIDENTS COUNCIL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 62% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jumpstart Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jumpstart Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JUMPSTART INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jumpstart Inc?

More from the funding graph

JUMPSTART INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jumpstart Inc?

More from the funding graph