Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julius V & Alice G Combs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$109kEducation$20kHealth$19kYouth Development$18kRecreation & Sports$13kHuman Services$12kInternational$10kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ART IN MOTION$5,000
MONEY MATTERS FOR YOUTH$5,000
OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
BRAZEAL DENNARD CHORALE$1,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,000
DURFEE AMERICAN GIRLS READING CLUB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ONE LOVE GLOBAL INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OH
NJ
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 14 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
44

Total granted

$162k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+20%

Still filing today

36%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • OI
    OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +78%
  • BT
    BOUND TOGETHER
    3× · 2018–2021 · $1k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • WW
    WARRIOR WOMEN AGAINST POVERTY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
3
College for Creative Studies

The college for creative studies nurtures the creativity that is vital to the enrichment of modern culture. the college educates visual artists and designers, knowledgeable in varied fields, who will be leaders in creative professions that…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Benedict College

Benedict college is committed to providing transformative learning experiences characterized by high quality academic, co-curricular and extra-curricular programming, intentionally designed to develop superior cultural and professional…

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
8
University of Detroit Mercy

Detroit Mercy, a Catholic university in the Jesuit and Mercy traditions, exists to provide excellent student-centered undergraduate and graduate education in an urban context. A UDM education seeks to integrate the intellectual, spiritual,…

Education
9
Drake University

See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…

Education
10
Colgate University

Colgate university's mission is to provide a demanding, expansive educational experience to a select group of diverse, talented, intellectually sophisticated students who are capable of challenging themselves, their peers and their…

Education
11
Baker College Professional Services

The mission of baker college is to provide an inclusive, innovative, and transformative educational experience which allows students to positively impact their lives and the world around them.

Education
12
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Optimist International Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lane College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSIC HALL: $70,000 · OtherMUSIC HALLMUSIC HALL CENTER: $30,150 · OtherMUSIC HALL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $13,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherWARRIOR WOMEN AGAINST POVERTY: $10,000 · OtherVARIOUS: $10,000 · OtherGREGORY KELSER BASKETBALL CAMP: $8,400 · Other+37 more: $55,392 · Other+37 moreDETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationBOUND TOGETHER: $1,350 · EducationLANE COLLEGE: $1,277 · EducationGAMMA XI BOULE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Education+3 more: $600 · EducationOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCO-ETTE CLUB INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,000 · HealthDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $500 · HealthONE LOVE GLOBAL: $5,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureOPERATION SMILE INC: $870 · InternationalCOTS: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$207,642Education$13,727Philanthropy$11,000Health$6,500Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$1,500International$870Housing & Shelter$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE LOVE GLOBAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOUND TOGETHER: $1,350 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLANE COLLEGE: $1,277 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZEAL DENNARD CHORALE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCO-ETTE CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $870 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENNETT COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds ONE LOVE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds BOUND TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds LANE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BRAZEAL DENNARD CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds CO-ETTE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julius V & Alice G Combs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julius V & Alice G Combs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julius V & Alice G Combs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph