Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julie & Bill Ruehle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$163kHealth$36kEducation$35kCivil Rights$32kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$8kScience & Tech$6kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$3,750
Median grant
5
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARS EQUALITY CENTER$15,000
CAETHEDRAL SCHOOL OF ST MARY$10,000
AMERICAS FUTURE$3,750
ALLEGHANY COLLEGE$2,500
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$1,000
NAMI NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL IL$210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 75% of grant dollars ($236k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 25% that went abroad ($78k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%IRANIAN AMERICAN WOMEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $850 → 14%WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 25% of all-years giving ($78k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Iran$57k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$10k · 1 grant
Canada$7k · 4 grants
Egypt$4k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 6 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
46

Total granted

$188k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    4× · 2018–2021 · $81k · revenue +93%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $57k
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • I
    IAWF
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
  • MF
    MAYHEW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
2
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center Inc

The mission of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center is to: Establish a comprehensive and objective historical record of the human rights situation in Iran, and on the basis of this record, establish responsibility for patterns of…

International
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
5
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
6
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
7
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
8
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
9
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
10
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
11
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter to Soldier Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $57,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIAWF: $16,500 · OtherIAWFPALS: $14,825 · OtherPALSFACE FOUNDATION: $13,339 · OtherFACE FOUNDATIONCATHEDRAL SCHOOL OF ST MARY: $10,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL SCHOOL OF ST MARYMAYHEW FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMAYHEW FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherSD MUSEUM OF ART: $6,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5,965 · Other+25 more: $28,004 · Other+25 moreSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $81,395 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCARANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,500 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETYMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $5,000 · Animals+4 more: $4,030 · AnimalsALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $6,000 · EducationNOTLEY IMPACT: $2,073 · EducationIRANIAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $800 · EducationPARS EQUALITY CENTER: $15,000 · Civil RightsIranian American Women Foundation: $1,500 · Human ServicesLICENSE TO FREEDOM: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesFARHANG FOUNDATION: $850 · Human ServicesOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $250 · Human ServicesCUREBOUND: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 · HealthTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 · HealthPERSIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLAS DAMAS: $75 · Arts & Culture
Other$170,133Animals$97,925Education$23,873Civil Rights$15,000Human Services$4,600Health$1,700Arts & Culture$1,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $81,395 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOTLEY IMPACT: $2,073 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIranian American Women Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPERSIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCUREBOUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLICENSE TO FREEDOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $930 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARHANG FOUNDATION: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRANIAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHRJ CHARITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
  • Who funds PARS EQUALITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTLEY IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds Iranian American Women Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PERSIAN CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds LICENSE TO FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds MONA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER TO SOLDIER INC ↗
  • Who funds FARHANG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IRANIAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Price Philanthropies FoundationCA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Price Philanthropies Foundation · California Community Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julie & Bill Ruehle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julie & Bill Ruehle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Julie & Bill Ruehle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Julie & Bill Ruehle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Julie & Bill Ruehle’s filings →

More from the funding graph