Skip to content
Judy Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Judy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$664k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$974kHousing & Shelter$452kEducation$308kEmployment$214kArts & Culture$186kYouth Development$145kHealth$67kInternational$64kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $658k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES$40,000
CARA$36,000
GENERATION HOPE$35,000
PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER$31,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$30,000
ST LEONARD MINISTRIES$30,000
MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION$28,000
A SAFE PLACE$27,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$26,000
CAROLINE CENTER INC$26,000
MARIAN HOUSE$25,000
LAKE COUNTY HAVEN$25,000
YWCA - MISSOULA$25,000
NEW MOMS$24,000
SISTER'S HOUSE$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $461k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $17k → 9%THE CARE CENTER: $15k → 11%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $10k → 9%YWCA - MISSOULA: $25k → 9%YWCA - MISSOULA: $24k → 9%ART WITH A HEART: $15k → 19%YWCA OF MISSOULA: $21k → 9%ART WITH A HEART: $15k → 19%ART WITH A HEART: $13k → 19%ART WITH A HEART: $12k → 19%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $28k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $26k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $26k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $24k → 8%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20k → 19%NEW MOMS: $24k → 14%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20k → 19%NEW MOMS: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE: $18k → 19%NEW MOMS: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE: $18k → 19%NEW MOMS INC: $6k → 14%SISTER'S HOUSE: $22k → 14%SISTERHOUSE: $22k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
MD
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 35 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
28

Total granted

$2.4M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+36%

Still filing today

89%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GENERATION HOPE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $137k · revenue +456%
  • BC
    BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $136k · revenue +132%
  • TC
    The Cara Program
    5× · 2020–2024 · $129k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CENTER OF HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -10%
  • HO
    HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NANTUCKET
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
3
Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership Inc D/B/a Metro Housing Boston

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter
4
Hitchcock Center for Women Inc

To wholistically empower women to achieve and maintain productive, chemically free lives at home, work and in the community.

Health
5
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
6
Rcap Solutions Inc Formerly Rural Housing Improvement Inc

Rental assistance received from a government agency under section 8 of the housing assistance payments program. providing technical assistance and training to low-income rural communities and other agencies in order to provide or enhance…

—
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
8
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
9
Community Solutions Inc

Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.

Health
10
Primo Center for Women & Children

For more than 45 years, primo center has empowered families experiencing homelessness to become productive, responsible, and independent members of their community.

Education
11
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
12
The Catherine Mcauley Center

The mission of the catherine mcauley center is to directly minister to women and to the economically poor. the catherine mcauley center commits itself to meeting the housing needs of women providing temporary shelter for women and children…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montana Preservation Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
43/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAROLINE CENTER INC: $105,090 · OtherCAROLINE CENTER INCMARIAN HOUSE: $94,000 · OtherMARIAN HOUSELAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $86,700 · OtherLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTERPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $72,000 · OtherPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTERMARWEN: $51,000 · OtherMARWENTHE JEANNETTE RANKIN FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 · OtherPROJECT CREATE ARTS CENTER: $26,500 · OtherTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $60,090 · OtherTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSH…826DC INC: $36,000 · OtherPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 · OtherPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPL…CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $51,000 · OtherCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC+23 more: $79,750 · Other+23 moreBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $136,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGE COMMUNITIES IN…THE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $98,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVENHOUSE OF RUTH: $72,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF RUTHJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAMTHE WOMEN'S HOUSING COALITION INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WOMEN'S HOUSING C…ROSIE'S PLACE INC: $36,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC+1 more: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMothers Trust Foundation: $104,000 · Human ServicesMothers Trust Foundat…ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLIC C…NEW MOMS INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INCYWCA MISSOULA: $70,000 · Human ServicesYWCA MISSOULAArt With a Heart Inc: $54,500 · Human ServicesArt With a Heart IncSISTERHOUSE: $44,000 · Human ServicesSISTERHOUSEMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA…+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesGENERATION HOPE: $137,000 · EducationGENERATION H…GOUCHER COLLEGE: $74,000 · EducationGOUCHER COLL…826CHI INC: $59,000 · Education826CHI INC+1 more: $400 · EducationThe Cara Program: $129,000 · EmploymentThe Cara …NORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $85,000 · EmploymentNORTH LAW…The People's Music School: $98,000 · Arts & CultureSITAR ARTS CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC: $29,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $7,050 · Arts & CultureSt Leonard's Ministries: $122,000 · Religion
Other$763,130Housing & Shelter$467,000Human Services$460,500Education$270,400Employment$214,000Arts & Culture$184,050Religion$122,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATION HOPE: $137,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $136,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetThe Cara Program: $129,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $122,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCAROLINE CENTER INC: $105,090 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation: $104,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $98,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetThe People's Music School: $98,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $86,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $85,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $76,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $74,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $72,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $72,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYWCA MISSOULA: $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $60,090 over 5y, 0.8% of budget826CHI INC: $59,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetArt With a Heart Inc: $54,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $51,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOUSING COALITION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSISTERHOUSE: $44,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE JEANNETTE RANKIN FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budget826DC INC: $36,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC: $29,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCREATING COMMUNITIES CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetSt Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe CARE Center: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHSIDE CENTER OF HOPE: $12,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $2,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT CREATE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget'SCONSET TRUST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY TOOLBANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CENTER FOR ELDER AFFAIRS INC: $800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHICAGO PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRWINDS-NANTUCKET'S COUNSELING CENTER: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The George & Marie Ch…Community Foundation …Annie E Casey Foundat…The Chicago Community…Blowitz-Ridgeway Foun…Helen V Brach Foundat…France-Merrick Founda…The Abell Foundation …The United Way of Cen…The Harry and Jeanett…Missoula Community Fo…John D and Catherine …
The George & Marie Chabot Charitable FoundationMA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Missoula Community Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Judy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Judy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Gosnold Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Art With a Heart Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wide Angle Youth Media Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Women's Housing Coalition Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Community Music Center: 1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Judy Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home