Skip to content
Jubitz Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jubitz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$454k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$1.5MInternational$786kEducation$317kCivil Rights$161kPublic Benefit$105kCrime & Legal$94kCommunity Improvement$75kAnimals$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $330k
$9,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARK$35,000
CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL$35,000
HOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP$30,000
COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER$30,000
COLUMBIA LAND TRUST$22,500
WELCOME HOME COALITION$15,000
OREGON WILD$15,000
ECOCHALLENGEORG$15,000
COLUMBIA INSIGHT$12,500
HUMBOLDT AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
RIOS TO RIVERS$10,000
STANFORD LAW SCHOOL$10,000
WIN WITHOUT WAR EDUCATION FUND$10,000
RETHINK MEDIA$10,000
CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NIMIIPUU PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT: $25k → 11%NONVIOLENT PEACEFORCE: $30k → 14%PLOUGHSHARES FUND: $15k → 10%HUMBOLDT AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35k → 18%COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER: $30k → 10%ROTARIAN ACTION GROUP FOR PEACE: $97k → 12%WILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT: $33k → 14%OSU FOUNDATION: $30k → 18%COLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $23k → 9%DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER OF KITSAP COUNT: $50k → 10%CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $35k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $41k → 6%NONVIOLENT PEACEFORCE: $25k → 14%HOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP: $30k → 10%OREGON AGRICULTURAL TRUST: $15k → 14%CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $25k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16k → 6%NETWORK OF OR WATERSHED COUNCILS: $32k → 8%HOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP: $25k → 10%OREGON AGRICULTURAL TRUST: $15k → 14%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $17k → 6%HOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%THE NEXT DOOR INC: $15k → 10%DRUM MAJOR AWARDS FUND CO VANCOUVER AVENUE BAPTIST CHURCH: $25k → 12%WELCOME HOME COALITION: $15k → 12%PORTLAND PEACE INITIATIVE: $15k → 12%GLOBAL ZERO: $20k → 14%COLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL: $74k → 12%COLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL: $30k → 12%VERDE NW: $25k → 12%SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $25k → 12%WORLD OREGON: $23k → 12%FRESHWATER TRUST: $20k → 12%FRESHWATER TRUST: $15k → 12%ECOCHALLENGEORG: $15k → 12%NORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE: $15k → 12%CRAG LAW CENTER: $15k → 12%OR BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $20k → 12%WATERWATCH OF OREGON: $20k → 12%WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $15k → 12%WATERWATCH OF OREGON: $15k → 12%OREGON WILD: $25k → 12%OREGON WILD: $20k → 12%BARK: $35k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Jubitz Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 60%.

Jubitz Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 74 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
36

Total granted

$2.7M
$485k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalEducationPublic BenefitAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Columbia Riverkeeper
    7× · 2019–2025 · $106k · revenue +57%
  • B
    BARK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $104k · revenue +9%
  • CS
    COLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $104k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • RA
    ROTARY ACTION GROUP FOR PEACE
    one grant, 2020 · $97k · revenue -41%
  • DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER OF KITSAPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +36%
  • WV
    WILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT DBA PCUN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
2
Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Nedc's mission is to work toward a future in which the pacific northwest leads the nation in developing, implementing & enforcing strong laws and regulations that protect the environment & human health, and where our governments &…

—
3
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment
4
Northwest Environmental Advocates

Work through advocacy and education to use federal environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act to protect and restore water quality and habit in the Pacific Northwest and nationwide.

Environment
5
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
6
Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility

Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility engages the community to create a healthy, just, peaceful and sustainable world. We take on the gravest current threats to human health and survival -- nuclear weapons, economic inequity, and…

International
7
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
8
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
9
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
10
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
11
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
12
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is Home Share Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/99
Grantees still filing
66/99
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Columbia Riverkeeper: $106,000 · EnvironmentColumbia RiverkeeperBARK: $104,000 · EnvironmentBARKCOLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $104,000 · EnvironmentCOLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL…HOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP: $90,000 · EnvironmentHOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUPOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: $90,000 · EnvironmentOregon Natural Resources Council …CRAG LAW CENTER: $65,000 · EnvironmentCRAG LAW CENTEROregon Agricultural Trust: $46,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $35,000 · Environment+18 more: $351,000 · Environment+18 moreWaterWatch of Oregon: $90,000 · OtherWaterWatch of OregonOREGON PEACE INSTITUTE: $55,000 · OtherOREGON PEACE INSTITUTENORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE: $55,000 · OtherNORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTEHUMBOLDT AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherWORLD OREGON: $42,940 · OtherSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $67,500 · OtherSUSTAINABLE NORTHWESTWaging Nonviolence Inc: $37,500 · OtherVerde Inc: $40,000 · Other+41 more: $528,610 · Other+41 moreROTARY ACTION GROUP FOR PEACE: $97,063 · InternationalROTARY ACTION GROUP FOR…CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $65,000 · InternationalCURE VIOLENCE GLOBALNonviolent Peaceforce: $65,000 · InternationalNonviolent PeaceforcePLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $59,500 · InternationalPLOUGHSHARES FUND INCGLOBAL ZERO: $52,500 · InternationalGLOBAL ZEROInkstick Media Inc: $50,000 · InternationalInkstick Media IncWin Without War Education Fund: $40,000 · InternationalWin Without War Educati…WOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI: $37,500 · InternationalWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CA…PEACE DIRECT INC: $25,000 · InternationalWorld Beyond War: $24,000 · International+15 more: $165,000 · International+15 moreUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $57,235 · EducationGEORGE MASO…SPEARFISH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC ED INC: $40,000 · EducationSPEARFISH F…Oregon State University Foundation: $40,000 · EducationOregon Stat…ReThink Media: $30,000 · EducationReThink Med…OREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE: $25,000 · EducationOREGON BUSI…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationSMART READING: $15,000 · Education+2 more: $19,825 · Education+2 moreDISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER OF KITSAP: $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalWILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT DBA PCUN FOUNDATION: $33,000 · Crime & LegalPORTLAND PEACE INITIATIVE INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $27,500 · Public BenefitFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $27,500 · Public BenefitWOMEN OF COLOR ADVANCING PEACE AND SECURITY WCAPS: $10,000 · Public BenefitTHE COUNCIL ON STRATEGIC RISKS: $5,000 · Public BenefitEASTERN OREGON WOMENS COALITION: $5,000 · Public BenefitTHE FRESHWATER TRUST: $45,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTER: $30,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $17,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsSAVE OUR WILD SALMON: $5,000 · Animals
Environment$991,500Other$961,550International$680,563Education$332,060Crime & Legal$128,000Public Benefit$110,000Animals$107,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColumbia Riverkeeper: $106,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBARK: $104,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $104,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWaterWatch of Oregon: $90,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetHOOD RIVER WATERSHED GROUP: $90,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: $90,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $67,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $65,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNonviolent Peaceforce: $65,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCRAG LAW CENTER: $65,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $59,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $57,235 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE: $55,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGLOBAL ZERO: $52,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetInkstick Media Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetDISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER OF KITSAP: $50,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetOregon Agricultural Trust: $46,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FRESHWATER TRUST: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPEARFISH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC ED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVerde Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWin Without War Education Fund: $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI: $37,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWaging Nonviolence Inc: $37,500 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPORTLAND PEACE INITIATIVE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 81% of budgetWILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT DBA PCUN FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork of Oregon Watershed Councils: $32,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCOLUMBIA INSIGHT: $30,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetCOAST RANGE ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwest Outward Bound School: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Hells Canyon Council: $30,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPER: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetReThink Media: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNIMIIPUU PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetPEACE DIRECT INC: $25,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWELCOME HOME COALITION: $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meyer Memorial TrustThe Oregon Community …The Collins FoundationThe Burning FoundationThe Lazar FoundationThe Bullitt FoundationPloughshares Fund IncEarth Day OregonPatagoniaorgSeeding JusticeThe Autzen FoundationThe Healy Foundation
Meyer Memorial TrustOR59× affinity30 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Burning Foundation · The Lazar Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Ploughshares Fund Inc · Earth Day Oregon · Patagoniaorg · Seeding Justice · The Autzen Foundation · The Healy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jubitz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jubitz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Harney County Watershed Council Inc: 91% of income from government
  • WaterWatch of Oregon: 61% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Willamette Riverkeeper: 42% of income from government
  • Crag Rats: 41% of income from government
  • The Next Door Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Clackamas River Basin Council Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Hood River Watershed Group: 20% of income from government
  • The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: 18% of income from government
  • Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation: 18% of income from government
  • The Freshwater Trust: 17% of income from government
  • Beyond Toxics: 13% of income from government
  • Columbia Slough Watershed Council Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association: 9% of income from government
  • Eastern Oregon Womens Coalition: 8% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest: 5% of income from government
  • Verde Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Bark: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Agricultural Trust: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: 2% of income from government
  • Columbia Riverkeeper: 1% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Tualatin Riverkeepers Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy: 0% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jubitz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jubitz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jubitz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home