Skip to content

· Private foundation

Juanita Gregg Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$170kHealth$168kReligion$130kArts & Culture$92kHuman Services$90kYouth Development$90kAnimals$28kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY$21,000
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC$20,000
YOUNG LIFE OF ST AUGUSTINE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PORT IN THE STORM HOMELESS YOUTH CE$10,000
ANGEL FLIGHT SOUTHEAST$10,000
THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION$10,000
GRACE'S CLOSET$10,000
TAILS OF TWO CITIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $15k → 17%FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $15k → 17%FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $10k → 17%GRACE'S CLOSET: $10k → 17%GRACE'S CLOSET: $10k → 17%GRACE'S CLOSET: $10k → 17%PENNEY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$835k · 14 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$835k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +750%
  • TC
    THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +145%
  • FA
    FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PLAYGROUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • SB
    SAINT BENEDICT HEALTH HEALING MINIS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • HS
    HILLSIDE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health
2
Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

Human Services
3
Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services
4
Bright Futures Farm

Equine sanctuary. accepts elder equines in need of rehabilitation and/or retirement.

Animals
5
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
6
Green Pasture Rest Home

Provide a home for mentally recovering patients in a conservative rest home enviroment with biblical spritiual staff. to be mentored to returned home, leading productive lives in the family, church, and community.

Housing & Shelter
7
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
8
Marys Meadow at Providence Place Inc

Mary's meadow at providence place offers long-term care, rehabilitation and spiritual support for the elderly.

—
9
Friends of Faith Ret Homes Inc

Lifecare for adults 62 and over.

Housing & Shelter
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothills Area Ymca; the most unlike its peers is Mercy Flight Se Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATIONYOUNG LIFE OF ST AUGUSTINE: $95,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE OF ST AUGUSTINEROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUI-RHYTHM: $92,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUI-RHYTHMPORT IN THE STORM HOMELESS YOUTH CE: $90,000 · OtherPORT IN THE STORM HOMELESS YOUTH CEIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMORRISON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherMORRISON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more: $42,000 · Other+4 moreFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATI…FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $40,000 · Human ServicesFOOTHILLS…Graces Closet: $30,000 · Human ServicesGraces Cl…PENNEY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPENNEY RE…ROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY: $47,000 · Recreation & SportsTAILS OF TWO CITIES DBA TAILS OF TWO CITIES SANCTUARY: $28,000 · AnimalsMercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: $20,000 · Health
Other$527,000Youth Development$170,000Human Services$75,000Recreation & Sports$47,000Animals$28,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY: $47,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetFOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $40,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGraces Closet: $30,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTAILS OF TWO CITIES DBA TAILS OF TWO CITIES SANCTUARY: $28,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetMercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPENNEY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA ↗
  • Who funds Graces Closet ↗
  • Who funds TAILS OF TWO CITIES DBA TAILS OF TWO CITIES SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast ↗
  • Who funds PENNEY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Juanita Gregg Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Juanita Gregg Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Flight Se Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: 0% of income from government
  • Penney Retirement Community Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Juanita Gregg’s filings →

More from the funding graph