Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jtb Cultural Exchange Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$815kFood & Nutrition$71kInternational$67kCommunity Improvement$45kReligion$19kEducation$16kCivil Rights$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONOLULU FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$180,000
US JAPAN COUNCIL$5,000
JAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION$3,000
JAPAN SOCIETY$3,000
JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF CHICAGO INC$2,000
JTB GOODWILL FOUNDATION$2,000
HONOLULU JAPANESE JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$2,000
JCC FUND$2,000
JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII$2,000
HAWAII UNITED OKINAWA ASSOCIATION$2,000
HONPA HONGWANJI MISSION OF HAWAII$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEIRO NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%KEIRO NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%KIMOCHI INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 27 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$1.0M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+76%

Still filing today

74%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +200%
  • UJ
    US- JAPAN COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +242%
  • JC
    JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • JS
    JAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HOUSTONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +76%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES HOMPA HONGWANJI BUDDIST TEMPLE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • JD
    JAPAN DAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
Japanese Festival of Houston Inc

Introduce the public to and educate the public on japanese culture

Arts & Culture
3
Japanese American Cultural Center of Vista

To promote and foster the understanding and appreciation of japanese and japanese american art, history, and culture. to preserve and disseminate inforation about the japanese american way of life to promote the study of the japanesese…

Arts & Culture
4
Us-Japan Research Institute Suite 801
—
5
Japan-America Society of Hawaii

To promote understanding and friendships between the people of japan and the united states. this mission is carried out through various educational programs, seminars, and special projects.

International
6
Nanka Kenjinkai Kyogikai Inc

To promote goodwill between the united states and japan, cultural exchange, education, and to encourage appreciation of the cultural heritage of various japanese prefectures in the kansai region of japan.

Arts & Culture
7
The Hawaii Japanese School

The school provides instruction to students who are of age to attend the compulsory education system of japan and to students who desire to learn the japanese language compatible with the standard educational curricula in japan; to enable…

Education
8
The Japan-American Society of Georgia Inc

Encouragement of relations between japanese and americans by means of conferences, forums, meetings, publications, athletics, and cultural means.

—
9
Japan America Society of Minnesota

JASM provides a place where both individuals and businesses are able to engage in cultural activities, meet others with an interest in Japan, form new business relationships, learn, and build mutual respect between Japan and America. Our…

Arts & Culture
10
Seattle Cherry Blossom and Japanese Cultural Festival Committee

Cultural education.

Recreation & Sports
11
Japan Cultural Exchange of New York Inc

Japan cultural exchange of new york is an organization for deepening understanding of and appreciation for japanese and american cultures. we offer services to japanese children who reside in the tri-state area and any non-japanese…

Arts & Culture
12
United States - Japan Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Japanese Cultural Center of Hawaii; the most unlike its peers is Northeast Council of Teachers of Japanese Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONOLULU FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $740,000 · Arts & CultureHONOLULU FESTIVAL FOUNDATIONJAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION+8 more: $67,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreJAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF CHICAGO: $18,000 · OtherJAPANESE …JCC FUND: $10,000 · OtherJCC FUNDCALIFORNIA TEACHERS OF THE YEAR FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherCALIFORNI…HONPA HONGWANJI MISSION OF HAWAII: $9,000 · OtherHONPA HON…JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 · OtherJAPANESE …HONOLULU JAPANESE JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,000 · OtherHONOLULU …BUDDHIST CHURCHES OF AMERICA: $6,000 · OtherBUDDHIST …+14 more: $23,500 · Other+14 moreUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $40,000 · InternationalJTB GOODWILL FOUNDATION: $18,000 · InternationalNortheast Council of Teachers of Japanese Ltd: $3,000 · InternationalJapan-America Society of DallasFort Worth: $3,000 · InternationalJAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HOUSTON: $3,000 · InternationalKEIRO NORTHWEST: $2,000 · Human ServicesKIMOCHI INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesJAPAN DAY INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsAlliance of Local Service Organizations: $1,000 · Community ImprovementORLANDO HOSHUKO INC: $1,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$877,000Other$91,500International$67,000Human Services$3,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Community Improvement$1,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONOLULU FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $740,000 over 9y, 96% of budgetJAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF CHICAGO: $18,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII: $18,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetHAWAII UNITED OKINAWA ASSOCIATION: $18,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJTB GOODWILL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJCC FUND: $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHONOLULU JAPANESE JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNISHIYAMATO INC DBA NISHIYAMATO ACADEMY OF CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Japan American Society of NW Florida Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetNortheast Council of Teachers of Japanese Ltd: $3,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetJapan-America Society of DallasFort Worth: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HOUSTON: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAKURA MATSURI INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKEIRO NORTHWEST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAPAN DAY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF JAPANESE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance of Local Service Organizations: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORLANDO HOSHUKO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOHANA ARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIMOCHI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HONOLULU FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE FOOD CULTURE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds US- JAPAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII UNITED OKINAWA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JTB GOODWILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JCC FUND ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOLULU JAPANESE JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds NISHIYAMATO INC DBA NISHIYAMATO ACADEMY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds The Japan American Society of NW Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northeast Council of Teachers of Japanese Ltd ↗
  • Who funds Japan-America Society of DallasFort Worth ↗
  • Who funds JAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS JAPANESE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAKURA MATSURI INC ↗
  • Who funds KEIRO NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds JAPAN DAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF JAPANESE INC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance of Local Service Organizations ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO HOSHUKO INC ↗
  • Who funds OHANA ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orix Stewardship FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orix Stewardship Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · Sumitomo Corporation of Americas Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jtb Cultural Exchange Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jtb Cultural Exchange Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jtb Cultural Exchange Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Jtb Cultural Exchange Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jtb Cultural Exchange’s filings →

    More from the funding graph