Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joyce Miller Owens Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8MReligion$358kHuman Services$171kRecreation & Sports$165kFood & Nutrition$117kArts & Culture$93kAnimals$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$133,104
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$133,104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $50k → 9%FISH of Vancouver: $44k → 9%Fish of Vancouver: $12k → 9%Fish of Vancouver: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 13 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$2.3M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+64%

Still filing today

31%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SAUVIE ISLAND SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.2M · revenue +80% · 49% of their budget
  • FO
    FISH OF VANCOUVER
    4× · 2017–2023 · $117k · revenue +360%
  • SE
    SOUND EQUINE OPTIONS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +200%

Funded once

  • WO
    Wind Oar Boat School
    one grant, 2017 · $77k
  • RH
    Rose Haven Day Shelter and Communit
    one grant, 2022 · $65k
  • TD
    THE DALLES-WASCO COUNTY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wa High School Equestrian Teams
Recreation & Sports
2
Springwater Environmental Sciences School

The mission of springwater environmental sciences school is to integrate the sciences throughout the academic core curriculum in a nurturing environment created and maintained by a high level of parent and community involvement.

Education
3
South Sound Christian Schools

To support the christian home and church by providing a biblically-based education for pre-kindergarten to 12th grades that challenges young lives to grow in faith, knowledge & skill so that they may glorify god and serve others.

—
4
Seacoast Christian School

Seacoast Christian School is a private not-for-profit non-boarding Christian school. In addition to striving for academic excellence, it seeks to teach students to be life-long servants of God and to live out their faith in all area of…

Education
5
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
6
Eugene Christian School

To assist families by proving a Christ-centered bible-based education that inspires each student to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and pursue excellence in moral character, academics, and service to others.

Education
7
Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education
8
Victory Christian Academy

The mission of victory christian academy, in partnership with christian parents, is to provide a loving, christ-centered environment of educational excellence so that the students may develop their gifts, knowledge, skills and energies to…

Education
9
Cape Charles Christian School Inc

Trusting in Gods guidance, the mission of Cape Charles School is to educate and develop the Whole Child in a non-denominational Christian setting

Education
10
Hume Lake Charter School

To create an exemplary academic environment that encourages and expects all students to learn and grow in every aspect of their person and to succeed in life in their chosen vocations.

Education
11
Luckiamute Valley Charter Schools

To create a community where students, staff and families work together to cultivate the academic, social, emotional, and ethical growth of each student.

Education
12
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sauvie Island School; the most unlike its peers is Oregon Duck Hunters Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAUVIE ISLAND SCHOOL: $1,199,306 · EducationSAUVIE ISLAND SCHOOLCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $133,104 · EducationCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL+2 more: $22,507 · EducationST MARYS ACADEMY: $438,698 · OtherST MARYS ACADEMYSt Peters Catholic Church: $212,698 · OtherSt Peters Catholic ChurchSisters of Holy Names of Jesus and: $81,607 · OtherSisters of Holy Names of Jesus andPORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $78,032 · OtherPORTLAND RESCUE MISSIONWind Oar Boat School: $77,456 · OtherWind Oar Boat SchoolMonument Senior Center: $74,734 · OtherMonument Senior CenterRose Haven Day Shelter and Communit: $65,439 · Other+18 more: $295,633 · Other+18 moreFISH OF VANCOUVER: $117,246 · Human ServicesSOUND EQUINE OPTIONS: $60,387 · AnimalsDucks Unlimited Inc: $5,000 · Environment
Education$1,354,917Other$1,324,297Human Services$117,246Animals$60,387Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAUVIE ISLAND SCHOOL: $1,199,306 over 4y, 49% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $133,104 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER: $117,246 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSOUND EQUINE OPTIONS: $60,387 over 3y, 11% of budgetWESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $18,976 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTRAWBERRY MOUNTAIN MUSTANGS INC: $7,600 over 1y, 11% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon Duck Hunters Association: $5,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetVictory Academy Inc: $3,531 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAUVIE ISLAND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF VANCOUVER ↗
  • Who funds SOUND EQUINE OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds STRAWBERRY MOUNTAIN MUSTANGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Duck Hunters Association ↗
  • Who funds Victory Academy Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joyce Miller Owens Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joyce Miller Owens Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Sauvie Island School: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joyce Miller Owens’ filings →

More from the funding graph