Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joshua Levine Memorial Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$42kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$16kHealth$6kCommunity Improvement$5kInternational$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$475
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,850
ADMIRALS COVE CARES FOUNDATION$1,800
JEWISH ADOPTION & FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$1,800
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$582
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
SAG HARBOR FIRE DEPARTMENT$475
SAG HARBOR FOOD PANTRY$453
SAG HARBOR AMBULANCE CORPORATION$450
SLOW FOOD USA$250
SAG HARBOR ART CENTER$150
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%STONEY BROOK FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%ALL FOR THE EAST END: $3k → 7%JEWISH ADOPTION & FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%ALL FOR THE EAST END: $2k → 7%JEWISH ADOPTION & FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION & FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%Wings Over Haiti: $300 → 7%Wings Over Haiti: $200 → 7%Wings Over Haiti: $200 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 19 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$128k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+38%

Still filing today

47%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +638%
  • BS
    BAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +74%
  • SH
    SAG HARBOR FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -97%
  • OW
    One World Childrens Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -64%
  • AG
    Adam Goodstein Memorial Fund
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Southampton Hospital Foundation Inc

The southampton hospital foundation, inc., a separate nonprofit corporation with an independent board of trustees, supports stony brook southampton hospital's mission to deliver healthcare services and expand clinical programs to meet the…

Health
2
The Brooklyn Hospital Foundation Inc

The foundation exists to support the vision and mission of the brooklyn hospital center (tbhc) through a charitable organization committed to the brooklyn community. the primary purpose and scope of the foundation is to support a broad…

—
3
Steinbeck House Incorporated

To own and operate the property located at 2 bluff point road, sag harbor, new york for writers in residence.

Arts & Culture
4
New Suffolk Waterfront Fund Inc

To preserve and protect new suffolk's unique and historic waterfront in ways which respect the property's scenic beauty and maritime heritage. to support recreational, educational and commercial activities on the site which enhance…

Environment
5
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
6
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
7
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

—
8
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
9
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Skin Cancer Foundation Inc

Public and medical education and research

—
11
Albany General Hospital Foundation

The foundation's specific purpose is to solicit, receive, and maintain gifts of money and property, and to make decisions on the distributions of such money and property, to support albany general hospital and health svcs in the general…

Health
12
One Brooklyn Health System Inc

One brooklyn health system, inc. (the system), was formed in october 2016, as a charitable corporation organized under the not-for-profit corporation law of the state of new york. among its purposes, the system was formed to foster and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund; the most unlike its peers is Wings Over Haiti Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $41,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSlow Food East End: $32,927 · OtherSlow Food East EndADMIRALS COVE CARES FOUNDATION: $13,200 · OtherADMIRALS COVE CARES FOUNDATIONBay Street Theatre: $7,500 · OtherBay Street TheatreJewish Adoption and Family Care Opt: $5,600 · OtherPlanned Parenthood: $4,050 · Other+20 more: $9,380 · Other+20 moreJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $5,400 · Human ServicesJewish Ad…ALL FOR THE EAST END INC: $4,688 · Human ServicesALL FOR T…WINGS OVER HAITI INC: $700 · Human ServicesWINGS OVE…+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesBAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,800 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureAMBER WAVES FARM INC: $950 · Food & NutritionSLOW FOOD USA INC: $750 · Food & NutritionSAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC: $705 · Food & NutritionOne World Childrens Fund: $1,800 · PhilanthropySAG HARBOR FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,175 · Public Safety & DisasterFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $582 · Community Improvement
Other$113,857Human Services$11,038Arts & Culture$6,900Food & Nutrition$2,405Philanthropy$1,800Public Safety & Disaster$1,175Community Improvement$582

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $5,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL FOR THE EAST END INC: $4,688 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAG HARBOR FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,175 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMBER WAVES FARM INC: $950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSLOW FOOD USA INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC: $705 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWINGS OVER HAITI INC: $700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $582 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTONS COLLEGIATE BASEBALL LEAGUE INC: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $302 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEYBROOK FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FOR THE EAST END INC ↗
  • Who funds SAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds One World Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds SAG HARBOR FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMBER WAVES FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds SLOW FOOD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OVER HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPTONS COLLEGIATE BASEBALL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wellness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joshua Levine Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joshua Levine Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joshua Levine Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph