· Private foundation
Joseph & Virginia Dibert Fdn Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of JOSEPH & VIRGINIA DIBERT FDN TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASCENSION ST JOHN FNDN | $25,000 |
| GRACE LUTHERN CHURCH | $25,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $20,000 |
| TULSA STREET SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| TULSA DREAM CENTER | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| TULSA DAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR | $10,000 |
| IRON GATE | $10,000 |
| FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES | $8,500 |
| HARVEST HOUSE | $7,500 |
| THE LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE | $7,500 |
| REVITALIZE T-TOWN | $5,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF METRO TULSA | $5,000 |
| INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS O | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
STREET SCHOOL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +84%
TULSA DREAM CENTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $98k · revenue +55%- NFNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- LOLAUNCH OUTREACHone grant, 2017 · $6k
- TATULSA ADVOCATES FOR PROTECTION CHILone grant, 2020 · $5k
- TATULSA ADVOCATES FOR PROTECTION OF Cone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities
Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.
Poverty alleviation/homelessness prevention
Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.
The organization provides emergency social and educational services to families in central oklahoma.
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.
Operate a volunteer community center for disadvantage individuals in tulsa, oklahoma.
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Dream Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Launch Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STREET SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds REVITALIZE T-TOWN ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS BURN CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FIT FIRST RESPONDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
- Who funds UP WITH TREES INC ↗
- Who funds LAUNCH OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joseph & Virginia Dibert Fdn Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Up With Trees Inc — 100% of income from government
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joseph & Virginia Dibert Fdn Trust?
Find your warmest path to Joseph & Virginia Dibert Fdn Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.