Skip to content
Joseph Rippey Charitable Tr Xxxxx9001 at a glance

· Private foundation

Joseph Rippey Charitable Tr Xxxxx9001

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$209kHealth$158kArts & Culture$64kYouth Development$38kHuman Services$37kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$21kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION OF THE$30,000
COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD OF$25,000
MARYS PLACE REFUGEE OUTREACH$15,000
VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT$10,000
DAVID HOCHSTEIN MEMORIAL MUSIC SCHOOL$10,000
MARY CARIOLA FOUNDATION$10,000
JUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC$9,000
LITTLE THEATRE FILM SOCIETY INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JOHNS HOME FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $11k → 14%ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $10k → 14%ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$801k · 9 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$801k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+27%

Still filing today

56%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Crime & LegalArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EAST HOUSE CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $158k · revenue +47%
  • TD
    The David Hochstein Memorial Music School Inc
    5× · 2022–2026 · $54k · revenue +7%
  • TL
    THE LITTLE THEATRE FILM SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $26k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S HOME FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $18k · revenue +20%
  • HOUSE OF MERCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +27%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's House of Hospitality

Our aim is to try each day to build a new society in the shell of the old as we practice the various works of mercy, and labor with whatever resources, physical as well as spiritual, that we have been given at the time.

—
2
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
3
Rochester Child Care Center Inc

The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…

Human Services
4
The Legal Aid Society of Westchester County

Securing justice for, protecting the rights of and rendering legal assistance and representation to indigent residents and non-residents of westchester county.

—
5
Crouse Community Center Inc

Crouse community center, inc is a residential health care facility whose mission is to provide long term health care, rehabilitation, and adult day care services to area residents requiring 24 hour skilled nursing residential health care…

Health
6
Rochester Contemporary Art Center Inc

To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs

Arts & Culture
7
The Children's Ctr At Suny Morrisville State College Inc

The center's mission is to provide quality childcare services to the morrisville state college campus and the local community in a safe and nurturing environment which promotes the social, emotional, physical, language and cognitive…

Unclassified
8
The Children's Law Center

To provide legal services to indigent children in contested custody/ visitation and related cases.

Crime & Legal
9
Rochester Civic Theatre

The mission of rochester civic theatre is to engage community organizations through collaboration and shared resources, enrich lives through education and outreach, and elevate human connection through theatre arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Schenectady Day Nursery Inc

Child day care services

Human Services
11
Halom House Inc

Halom house, inc. is a private, non-profit residential agency supporting adults with developmental disabilities in the southern ohio area. halom house, inc. is dedicated to upholding the rights and responsibilities of every client served;…

—
12
Rochester Management Inc

To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East House Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Judicial Process Commission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION OF THE: $246,000 · OtherFRIENDS AND FOUNDATION OF THECOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD OF: $234,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD OFYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVMENT OF CENTRAL UPSTATE: $18,411 · Other+2 more: $15,000 · OtherEAST HOUSE CORPORATION: $158,000 · HealthEAST HOUSE CORPORATIO…MARY CARIOLA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthMARY CARIOLA FOUNDATI…The David Hochstein Memorial Music School Inc: $54,000 · Arts & CultureThe David H…THE LITTLE THEATRE FILM SOCIETY INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LITTLE …Mary's Place Outreach Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMary's Plac…ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $19,412 · Human ServicesST JOHN'S HOME FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $10,516 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $10,000 · Crime & LegalJUDICIAL PROCESS COMMISSION INC: $9,000 · Crime & LegalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$538,411Health$168,000Arts & Culture$95,000Human Services$47,928Crime & Legal$29,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST HOUSE CORPORATION: $158,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe David Hochstein Memorial Music School Inc: $54,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LITTLE THEATRE FILM SOCIETY INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $19,412 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $10,516 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Commun…Daisy Marquis Jones F…Max and Marian Farash…United Way of Greater…William & Sheila Kona…Paychex Charitable Fo…Rochester Area Commun…Esl Charitable Founda…Davenport-Hatch Found…Fred and Floy Willmot…Charles J & Burton S …The Polisseni Foundat…
Rochester Area Community FoundationNY21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Esl Charitable Foundation · Davenport-Hatch Foundation · Fred and Floy Willmott Foundation 14-217520 · Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation · The Polisseni Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Rippey Charitable Tr Xxxxx9001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Rippey Charitable Tr Xxxxx9001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Rippey Charitable Tr Xxxxx9001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home