Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$156kHealth$137kEducation$120kFood & Nutrition$74kReligion$60kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE SCHOOL$20,000
ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MONTE CASSINO SCHOOL$10,000
TABITHA MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
MADONNA FOUNDATION$10,000
GIFT OF LIFE TRANSPLANT HOUSE$4,000
CREIGHTON COLLEGE OF NURSING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OMAHA CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 12%VILLA MARIE SCHOOL: $20k → 13%MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%MONTE CASSINO SCHOOL: $25k → 15%CDC FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%OMAHA CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 12%VILLA MARIE SCHOOL: $15k → 13%MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%MONTE CASSINO SCHOOL: $10k → 15%HEART MINISTRY CENTER: $19k → 12%VILLA MARIE SCHOOL: $8k → 13%GIFT OF LIFE TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $4k → 9%FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $20k → 12%FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN: $20k → 13%ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20k → 12%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN: $15k → 13%ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 12%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN: $10k → 13%MOUNT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE SCHOOL: $20k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%MT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE: $15k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%MOUNT MICHAEL ABBEY: $8k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%CREIGHTON COLLEGE OF NURSING: $1k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%MOUNT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE SCHOOL: $7k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $12k → 13%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%MOUNT MICHAEL ABBEY: $3k → 12%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%MADONNA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%ST GIANNA WOMEN'S HOME: $5k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $20k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $20k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $16k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $16k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $15k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $10k → 13%TABITHA MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $5k → 13%TABITHA MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 13%TABITHA MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 82%.

Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$532k · 13 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$532k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+29%

Still filing today

23%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MADONNA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +87%
  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $58k · revenue +20%
  • MT
    MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $38k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • HM
    HEART MINISTRY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +195%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital

Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals is a Catholic organization that exists to provide medical and physical rehabilitation services to children and adults throughout the nation. We rehabilitate those who have sustained injuries or disabling…

Health
2
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Mercy Hospital of Franciscan Sisters Inc

We, mercy hospital of franciscan sisters and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy hospital of franciscan sisters is a member of…

Health
5
Nebraska Heart Hospital

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
6
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
7
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
8
Trinity Health & Affiliates

Trinity health is committed to preserving and improving the quality of health of the people we serve. our mission is to excel at meeting the needs of the whole person through the provision of quality health care and health related services.

Health
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
11
Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
12
Food Bank of Lincoln Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to the development and implementation of the food bank, an organization exempt under code section 501(c)(3).

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart Ministry Center; the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $58,200 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICESCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $49,500 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INCCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKAVILLA MARIE SCHOOL: $42,500 · OtherVILLA MARIE SCHOOLMONTE CASSINO SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · OtherMONTE CASSINO SCHOOL INCOMAHA CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $30,000 · OtherOMAHA CATHOLIC CHARITIESST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCHMOUNT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE SCHOOL: $26,500 · OtherMOUNT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherTABITHA MEALS ON WHEELS: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $16,500 · OtherTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $127,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MADONNA FOUNDATIONFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $18,800 · Food & NutritionMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $38,000 · Human ServicesGIFT OF LIFE INC: $4,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $2,000 · HealthNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCreighton University: $1,000 · Education
Other$408,200Philanthropy$127,000Food & Nutrition$38,800Human Services$38,000Health$6,000Arts & Culture$2,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $127,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $58,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $38,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $18,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph R and Barbara a Gard Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph