Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph Hara Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$243kReligion$205kInternational$59kHuman Services$47kHealth$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kEducation$16kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$911k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA FEDERATION NEW YORK$60,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$13,000
CHABAD OF UCF$10,000
CONGREGATION OHEV-SHALOM$6,438
Individual grant recipient$6,000
SHALOM ORLANDO$5,000
ORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$5,000
CHABAD OF NORTH ORLANDO$3,000
GROWING PLACE$3,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC$1,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$1,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GROWING PLACE: $3k → 14%HOSPICE OF THE COMFORTER: $2k → 11%KINNERET COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 13%KINNERET COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 13%KINNERET COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 13%KINNERET COUNCIL ON AGING: $500 → 13%KINNERET COUNCIL ON AGING: $500 → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Joseph Hara Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Joseph Hara Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$503k · 23 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
29

Total granted

$503k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+42%

Still filing today

48%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +81%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +117%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • JA
    JEWISH ACADEMY OF ORLANDO
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CF
    CENTRAL FLORIDA ERUV SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF GREATER ORLANDO - CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISRAEL
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
8
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
9
Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

Philanthropy
10
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
11
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
12
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shalom Orlando Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION OHEV SHALOM INC: $67,805 · OtherCONGREGATION OHEV SHALOM INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORLANDO: $66,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORLANDOCHABAD OF UCF: $47,500 · OtherCHABAD OF UCFIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD AT UCF INC: $20,000 · OtherCHABAD AT UCF INCIndividual grant recipient: $17,100 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS YISRAEL CORPORATION: $16,500 · OtherOHEV SHALOM CONGREGATION INC: $12,820 · Other+29 more: $64,050 · Other+29 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $51,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AM…SHALOM ORLANDO INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropySHALOM ORLANDO INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 · Human ServicesKinneret Council on Aging Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesGROWING PLACE: $3,000 · Human ServicesAdventHealth Home Health and Hospice Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $17,000 · International+2 more: $2,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $4,000 · HealthPATHWAYS TO CARE INC: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC: $5,500 · EducationABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 · Civil RightsHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 · Religion
Other$334,775Philanthropy$197,000Human Services$44,000International$39,500Health$16,500Education$7,500Civil Rights$1,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $51,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM ORLANDO INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKinneret Council on Aging Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING PLACE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdventHealth Home Health and Hospice Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS TO CARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFESPACE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Kinneret Council on Aging Inc ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROWING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Home Health and Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pargh FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pargh Foundation · Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Hara Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Hara Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shalom Orlando Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph Hara Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Joseph Hara Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph Hara’s filings →

More from the funding graph