· Private foundation
Joseph & Florence Roblee Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k48 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI ORGANIZING & VOTER ENGAGEMENT | $75,000 |
| ACLU OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PROMO FUND | $50,000 |
| METRO TRANS UMBRELLA GROUP | $40,000 |
| ACTION ST LOUIS | $37,500 |
| THISTL | $35,000 |
| YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA | $30,000 |
| WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK | $30,000 |
| WEPOWER | $30,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF FLORIDA | $30,000 |
| THE BLACK COLLECTIVE | $30,000 |
| KIDS WIN MISSOURI | $30,000 |
| MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE | $30,000 |
| EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE | $30,000 |
| EMANCIPATE NC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
57 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $531k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SOULFISHER MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +109%
- AFAMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER4× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +14%
- MBMISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT5× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- GEGATEWAY EARLY CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE-STL FDNone grant, 2023 · $45k
- MMMOVE MO- MISSOURI INCLUSIVE DEMOone grant, 2023 · $30k
- ACAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri Fundone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…
To support the work of the amercian civil liberties union of louisiana through litigation, public education and limited lobbying in support of civil liberties.
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Equality illinois builds a better illinois by advancing equal treatment and social justice through education, advocacy and protection of the rights of the lgbt community.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…
Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.
To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.
Pregnancy counseling
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Fair Food. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SOULFISHER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CATALYST MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATE HEALTH STL ↗
- Who funds National Network of Abortion Funds ↗
- Who funds Emancipate NC Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds DREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY ↗
- Who funds ACTION ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds WEPOWER ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS WIN MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THISTL ↗
- Who funds PROMO FUND ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Abortion Action Missouri Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds East Side Aligned ↗
- Who funds YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURN THE PAGE STL ↗
- Who funds ARCHCITY DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds Missouri Workers Center ↗
- Who funds STL YOUTH JOBS ↗
- Who funds Metro Trans Umbrella Group ↗
- Who funds Black Girls Do STEM ↗
- Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT YESINC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Trio Foundation of St Louis · St Louis Community Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Washington University · Pecha Family Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Brown Dana Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joseph & Florence Roblee Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- Ywca South Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joseph & Florence Roblee Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Joseph & Florence Roblee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.