Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph C and Blanche Coutu Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$194kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$24kHousing & Shelter$21kFood & Nutrition$15k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
$7,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT RAPHAEL ACADEMY$36,000
ST TERESA SCHOOL$18,000
McAuley Corporation$7,200
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET$7,200
Pawtucket Soup Kitchen$4,800
JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE OF THE LITTLE$3,600
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL RHODE$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $4k → 14%Crossroads Rhode Island: $4k → 14%Crossroads Rhode Island: $4k → 14%Crossroads Rhode Island: $4k → 14%Crossroads Rhode Island: $3k → 14%CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $2k → 14%CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$360k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MCAULEY CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2026 · $32k · revenue +49%
  • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET
    6× · 2021–2026 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +99%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    4/5
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SAINT RAPHAEL ACADEMY: $166,600 · OtherSAINT RAPHAEL ACADEMYSaint Teresa School: $43,500 · OtherSaint Teresa SchoolST TERESA SCHOOL: $38,000 · OtherST TERESA SCHOOLMCAULEY CORPORATION: $31,600 · OtherMCAULEY CORPORATION+3 more: $18,800 · Other+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET: $24,600 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $20,800 · Human ServicesPAWTUCKET SOUP KITCHEN: $16,400 · Community Improvement
    Other$298,500Youth Development$24,600Human Services$20,800Community Improvement$16,400

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCAULEY CORPORATION: $31,600 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET: $24,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $20,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPAWTUCKET SOUP KITCHEN: $16,400 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (SVDP) RHODE ISLAND: $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MCAULEY CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET ↗
    • Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
    • Who funds PAWTUCKET SOUP KITCHEN ↗
    • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (SVDP) RHODE ISLAND ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Washington Trust Co Charitable FdnRI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Champlin Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Joseph C and Blanche Coutu Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph C and Blanche Coutu Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Joseph C and Blanche Coutu Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Joseph C and Blanche Coutu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Joseph C and Blanche Coutu’s filings →

      More from the funding graph